Different treatment modalities and outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of 31 cases in a unıversity hospital
- PMID: 31276180
- DOI: 10.5603/GP.2019.0053
Different treatment modalities and outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of 31 cases in a unıversity hospital
Abstract
Objectives: There is no standardized treatment modality or a generally accepted guideline in cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treatment. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of the different treatment modalities used in CSP treatment.
Material and methods: 31 CSP patients retrospectively evaluated between May 2011 and February at Uludag University Hospital in Bursa, Turkey included in the study. A graphical flowchart according to the treatment modalities and timeline graphics of the patients were used. Main outcome measures were recurrent CSPs and healthy pregnancies in clinical follow-up after a successful CSP treatment.
Results: 31 CSP patients were treated with six different treatment modalities in our series. Recurrent CSP was diagnosed in three patients after a successful CSP treatment. All of these recurrent CSPs were treated with D/C procedure in their first CSP. Six patients conceived again in clinical follow-up after successful treatment of CSP.
Conclusions: CSP is a serious maternal complication that risks the mother's life, and this problem is growing because of the increased cesarean rates. Invasive procedures applied to the uterus in CSP treatment may cause recurrent CSP in the next pregnancy of the patient. When considering the treatment options of the CSP, minimally invasive treatment modalities and the subsequent gestation of the patient should be taken into account.
Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy; Morbidly adherent placenta; treatment modalities.
Similar articles
-
Incorporating uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy following diagnostic ultrasonography.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Aug;134(2):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Apr 8. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 27126907
-
[Cesarean scar pregnancy analysis of 42 cases].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;44(8):566-9. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 20003781 Chinese.
-
Combination of medical and surgical management in successful treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a case report series.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 13;20(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03237-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 33050911 Free PMC article.
-
Recurrent Cesarean scar pregnancy: case series and literature review.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;58(1):121-126. doi: 10.1002/uog.23577. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33411387 Review.
-
Different treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancies: a single-center experience and literature review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 May;303(5):1143-1151. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05831-9. Epub 2020 Oct 13. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33048187 Review.
Cited by
-
Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis after Cesarean section: a pictorial review.Insights Imaging. 2020 May 27;11(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00876-5. Insights Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32462368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the risk factors and management outcomes of ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective case-control study.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023 May 12;21(5):403-414. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13475. eCollection 2023 May. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023. PMID: 37362094 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical treatment and reproductive outcomes in caesarean scar pregnancy at a single center.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 May 11;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01225-7. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024. PMID: 38734672 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy: an 8-year experience at a single institution.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 May;303(5):1223-1233. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05906-7. Epub 2021 Jan 3. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33389114
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical