A Citrus Peel Waste Biorefinery for Ethanol and Methane Production
- PMID: 31277372
- PMCID: PMC6651380
- DOI: 10.3390/molecules24132451
A Citrus Peel Waste Biorefinery for Ethanol and Methane Production
Abstract
This paper deals with the development of a citrus peel waste (CPW) biorefinery that employs low environmental impact technologies for production of ethanol and methane. Three major yeasts were compared for ethanol production in batch fermentations using CPW pretreated through acid hydrolysis and a combination of acid and enzyme hydrolysis. The most efficient conditions for production of CPW-based hydrolyzates included processing at 116 °C for 10 min. Pichia kudriavzevii KVMP10 achieved the highest ethanol production that reached 30.7 g L-1 in fermentations conducted at elevated temperatures (42 °C). A zero-waste biorefinery was introduced by using solid biorefinery residues in repeated batch anaerobic digestion fermentations achieving methane formation of 342 mL gVS-1 (volatile solids). Methane production applying untreated and dried CPW reached a similar level (339-356 mL gVS-1) to the use of the side stream, demonstrating that the developed bioprocess constitutes an advanced alternative to energy intensive methods for biofuel production.
Keywords: bioethanol; biomethane; biorefinery; biorefinery residues; citrus peel waste.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
), dried citrus peel waste (DCPW) (
), and solid biorefinery residues (BR) (
). A control fermentation was conducted without the addition of CPW (
), while all experiments were conducted at 37 °C. Dashed lines represent the time where substrate refeed was applied.
), DCPW (
), solid BR (
), and in the control experiment (
).
), 6 g L−1 (
), 12 g L−1 (
), and 24 g L−1 (
) initial volatile solids of CPW. A control fermentation was performed without the addition of CPW (
), while all experiments were conducted at 37 °C.References
-
- Kosseva M.R. Sources, characterization, and composition of food industry wastes. In: Kosseva M.R., Webb C., editors. Food Industry Wastes. 1st ed. Elsevier Inc.; London, UK: 2013. pp. 37–60.
-
- FAO . Citrus Fruit Statistics 2015. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2016. p. 53.
-
- Marin F.R., Soler-Rivas C., Benavente-Garcia O., Castillo J., Perez-Alvarez J.A. By-products from different citrus processes as a source of customized functional fibres. Food Chem. 2007;100:736–741. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.04.040. - DOI
-
- Wilkins M.R. Effect of orange peel oil on ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33:538–541. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.010. - DOI
-
- Negro V., Bernardo R., Fino D. Recovery of energy from orange peels through anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis processes after D-limonene extraction. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2018;9:1331–1337. doi: 10.1007/s12649-017-9915-z. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
