Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 4;9(7):e029908.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029908.

Prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies: a population-based register study

Katariina Laine  1   2 , Gulim Murzakanova  1 , Kristina Baker Sole  3 , Aase Devold Pay  1 , Siri Heradstveit  1 , Sari Räisänen  4
Affiliations

Prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies: a population-based register study

Katariina Laine et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies.

Design: Population-based cohort study.

Setting: Medical Birth Registry of Norway and Statistics Norway.

Participants: 929 963 deliveries with 16 174 twin pregnancies in 1999-2014.

Methods: Pre-eclampsia prevalences in twin and singleton pregnancies were described in percentages. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the risks of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies compared with those in singleton pregnancies, adjusted for previously known risk factors.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension.

Results: The prevalence of pre-eclampsia in the study population was 3.7% (3.4% in singleton pregnancies, 11.8% in twin pregnancies (p=0.001)). The OR for pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancies was three to fourfold compared with singleton pregnancies (OR 3.78; 95% CI 3.59 to 3.96). After adjustment for known risk factors, twin pregnancy remained an independent risk factor for pre-eclampsia (adjusted OR 4.07; 95% CI 3.65 to 4.54). The prevalence of gestational hypertension was 1.7% in women with singleton pregnancies and 2.2% in those with twin pregnancies (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.41). After adjustment for known risk factors, gestational hypertension was not significantly associated with twin pregnancy.

Conclusions: The risk of pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancies was three to fourfold compared with singleton pregnancies, regardless of maternal age, parity, educational level, smoking, maternal comorbidity or in vitro fertilisation. The risk of gestational hypertension was not increased in women with twin pregnancies after adjustment for the main risk factors.

Keywords: gestational hypertension; preeclampsia; twin pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declarerd.

References

    1. Ros HS, Cnattingius S, Lipworth L. Comparison of risk factors for preeclampsia and gestational hypertension in a population-based cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:1062–70. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009400 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts CL, Ford JB, Algert CS, et al. . Population-based trends in pregnancy hypertension and pre-eclampsia: an international comparative study. BMJ Open 2011;1:e000101–2011. 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen M, Smith GN, Rodger M, et al. . Comparison of risk factors and outcomes of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. PLoS One 2017;12:e0175914 10.1371/journal.pone.0175914 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francisco C, Wright D, Benkő Z, et al. . Hidden high rate of pre-eclampsia in twin compared with singleton pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50:88–92. 10.1002/uog.17470 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sibai BM, Hauth J, Caritis S, et al. . Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:938–42. 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70350-4 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types