Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2019 Sep;16(3):455-461.
doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09927-z. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

Enhanced Interrogation, Consequential Evaluation, and Human Rights to Health

Affiliations
Comment

Enhanced Interrogation, Consequential Evaluation, and Human Rights to Health

Benedict S B Chan. J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Balfe argues against enhanced interrogation. He particularly focuses on the involvement of U.S. healthcare professionals in enhanced interrogation. He identifies several empirical and normative factors and argues that they are not good reasons to morally justify enhanced interrogation. I argue that his argument can be improved by making two points. First, Balfe considers the reasoning of those healthcare professionals as utilitarian. However, careful consideration of their ideas reveals that their reasoning is consequential rather than utilitarian evaluation. Second, torture is a serious human rights abuse. When healthcare professionals become involved in enhanced interrogation, they violate not only human rights against torture but also human rights to health. Considering the consequential reasoning against human rights abuses, healthcare professionals' involvement in enhanced interrogation is not morally justified. Supplementing Balfe's position with these two points makes his argument more complete and convincing, and hence it can contribute to the way which shows that enhanced interrogation is not justified by consequential evaluation.

Keywords: Consequential evaluation; Enhanced interrogation; Healthcare professionals; Human rights to health; Torture; Utilitarianism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. JAMA. 2004 Mar 24;291(12):1480-6 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 29;351(5):415-6 - PubMed
    1. J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Sep;13(3):449-60 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources