Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Dec;29(12):6477-6488.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06331-4. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis

Thierry Lefebvre et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To perform head-to-head comparisons of the feasibility and diagnostic performance of transient elastography (TE), point shear-wave elastography (pSWE), and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional, dual-center imaging study included 100 patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease caused by hepatitis B or C virus, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or autoimmune hepatitis identified between 2014 and 2018. Liver stiffness measured with the three elastographic techniques was obtained within 6 weeks of a liver biopsy. Confounding effects of inflammation and steatosis on association between fibrosis and liver stiffness were assessed. Obuchowski scores and AUCs for staging fibrosis were evaluated and the latter were compared using the DeLong method.

Results: TE, pSWE, and MRE were technically feasible and reliable in 92%, 79%, and 91% subjects, respectively. At univariate analysis, liver stiffness measured by all techniques increased with fibrosis stages and inflammation and decreased with steatosis. For classification of dichotomized fibrosis stages, the AUCs were significantly higher for distinguishing stages F0 vs. ≥ F1 with MRE than with TE (0.88 vs. 0.71; p < 0.05) or pSWE (0.88 vs. 0.73; p < 0.05), and for distinguishing stages ≤ F1 vs. ≥ F2 with MRE than with TE (0.85 vs. 0.75; p < 0.05). TE, pSWE, and MRE Obuchowski scores for staging fibrosis stages were respectively 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96).

Conclusion: MRE provided a higher diagnostic performance than TE and pSWE for staging early stages of liver fibrosis.

Trial registration: NCT02044523 KEY POINTS: • The technical failure rate was similar between MRE and US-based elastography techniques. • Liver stiffness measured by MRE and US-based elastography techniques increased with fibrosis stages and inflammation and decreased with steatosis. • MRE provided a diagnostic accuracy higher than US-based elastography techniques for staging of early stages of histology-determined liver fibrosis.

Keywords: Classification; Elasticity imaging techniques; Fibrosis; Liver; Prospective studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):638-48 - PubMed
    1. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17558-67 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2017 Mar;282(3):726-733 - PubMed
    1. Hepatology. 2013 Mar;57(3):1182-91 - PubMed
    1. Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):659-66 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources