Perceived relative harm of using e-cigarettes predicts future product switching among US adult cigarette and e-cigarette dual users
- PMID: 31278802
- DOI: 10.1111/add.14730
Perceived relative harm of using e-cigarettes predicts future product switching among US adult cigarette and e-cigarette dual users
Abstract
Background and aims: People's perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarettes, compared with cigarettes, may influence their product use decisions. We tested if perceiving e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes predicted whether cigarette and e-cigarette dual users switched their product use status 1 year later, becoming exclusive e-cigarette users, exclusive cigarette smokers, or non-users of both product types.
Design: Longitudinal analyses of waves 2 (2014-15) and 3 (2015-16) of the prospective, national Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.
Setting: United States.
Participants: Adults who reported using both cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 2 reported their perceptions of e-cigarette harm at wave 2, and reported whether they used cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 3 (n = 2211).
Measurements: The key predictor was wave 2 perceptions of e-cigarette harm compared with cigarettes ('less harmful,' 'about the same', 'more harmful' or 'don't know'). The key outcome was wave 3 past 30-day use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes, classified into four categories: exclusive e-cigarette use (i.e. use of e-cigarettes but not cigarettes), exclusive cigarette smoking (i.e. use of cigarettes but not e-cigarettes), dual use of both product types and non-use of both product types.
Findings: At wave 2, 59.4% of dual users perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes [95% confidence interval (CI) = 56.9, 61.9]. Compared with those with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm, dual users who perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes were more likely to become exclusive e-cigarette users 1 year later [7.5 versus 2.7%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.7-4.8], more likely to remain dual users (39.6 versus 29.9%; aOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2-1.8), less likely to become exclusive cigarette smokers (44.8 versus 59.4%; aOR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.7) and similarly likely to become non-users of both product types (8.2 versus 8.0%; aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7).
Conclusions: US adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes who perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes appear to be more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use, more likely to remain dual users and less likely to switch to exclusive cigarette use 1 year later than dual users with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm.
Keywords: E-cigarette; ENDS; harm perception; perceived relative harm; product substitution; product use transitions; product-switching.
Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
References
-
- Brown J., Beard E., Kotz D., Michie S., West R. Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: a cross-sectional population study. Addiction 2014; 109: 1531-1540.
-
- Yong H. H., Hitchman S. C., Cummings K. M., Borland R., Gravely S. M. L., McNeill A. et al. Does the regulatory environment for e-cigarettes influence the effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation?: longitudinal findings from the ITC four country survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2017; 19: 1268-1276.
-
- Filippidis F. T., Laverty A. A., Gerovasili V., Vardavas C. I. Two-year trends and predictors of e-cigarette use in 27 European Union member states. Tob Control 2017; 26: 98-104.
-
- Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association. Testimonials. 2019. Available at: http://www.casaa.org/testimonials/ (accessed 16 July 2019 (Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/77F6vj9fH on 16 July 2019).
-
- Giovenco D. P., Delnevo C. D. Prevalence of population smoking cessation by electronic cigarette use status in a national sample of recent smokers. Addict Behav 2018; 76: 129-134.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
