Go in Peace: Brain Death, Reasonable Accommodation and Jewish Mourning Rituals
- PMID: 31280412
- DOI: 10.1007/s10943-019-00874-y
Go in Peace: Brain Death, Reasonable Accommodation and Jewish Mourning Rituals
Abstract
Religious objections to brain death are common among Orthodox Jews. These objections often lead to conflicts between families of patients who are diagnosed with brain death, and physicians and hospitals. Israel, New York and New Jersey (among other jurisdictions) include accommodation clauses in their regulations or laws regarding the determination of death by brain-death criteria. The purpose of these clauses is to allow families an opportunity to oppose or even veto (in the case of Israel and New Jersey) determinations of brain death. In New York, the extent and duration of this accommodation period are generally left to the discretion of individual institutions. Jewish tradition has embraced cultural and psychological mechanisms to help families cope with death and loss through a structured process that includes quick separation from the physical body of the dead and a gradual transition through phases of mourning (Aninut,Kriah, timely burial, Shiva, Shloshim, first year of mourning). This process is meant to help achieve closure, acceptance, support for the bereaved, commemoration, faith in the afterlife and affirmation of life for the survivors. We argue that the open-ended period of contention of brain death under the reasonable accommodation laws may undermine the deep psychological wisdom that informs the Jewish tradition. By promoting dispute and conflict, the process of inevitable separation and acceptance is delayed and the comforting rituals of mourning are deferred at the expense of the bereft family. Solutions to this problem may include separating discussions of organ donation from those concerning the diagnosis of brain death per se, allowing a period of no escalation of life-sustaining interventions rather than unilateral withdrawal of mechanical ventilation, engagement of rabbinical leaders in individual cases and policy formulations that prioritize emotional support for families.
Keywords: Brain death; Judaism; Mourning; Reasonable accommodation.
Similar articles
-
[A psychosocial view of a number of Jewish mourning rituals during normal and pathological grief].Harefuah. 2004 Apr;143(4):287-90, 317. Harefuah. 2004. PMID: 15116587 Review. Hebrew.
-
Judaism.Cancer Treat Res. 2023;187:237-259. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-29923-0_17. Cancer Treat Res. 2023. PMID: 37851231
-
Death, bereavement and traumatic loss in Israel: a historical and cultural perspective.Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2001;38(3-4):157-70. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2001. PMID: 11725415
-
Jewish tradition in death and dying.Medsurg Nurs. 1998 Oct;7(5):275-9. Medsurg Nurs. 1998. PMID: 10036429 Review.
-
Saying kaddish: Meaning-making and continuing bonds in American Jewish mourning ritual.Death Stud. 2021;45(1):19-28. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1851887. Epub 2020 Dec 4. Death Stud. 2021. PMID: 33272143
Cited by
-
Views of leaders in under-represented and equity-denied communities on organ and tissue donation in Nova Scotia, Canada, in light of the Human Organ and Tissue Donation Act: a qualitative descriptive study.BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 18;13(4):e068726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068726. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37072355 Free PMC article.
-
Death pluralism: a proposal.Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2023 Aug 2;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2023. PMID: 37528432 Free PMC article.
-
An Investigation into the Public's Attitude Toward Opting out of Brain Death.Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug;43(1):262-276. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02196-8. Epub 2025 Jan 14. Neurocrit Care. 2025. PMID: 39810074 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources