Comment
doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000576636.67696.ab.
Epub 2019 Sep 6.
Reply by Authors
Affiliations
- PMID: 31282267
- DOI: 10.1097/01.JU.0000576636.67696.ab
Item in Clipboard
Comment
Reply by Authors
J Urol.
2019 Oct.
No abstract available
Comment on
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2019 Oct;202(4):800. doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000576632.82943.af. Epub 2019 Sep 6. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31282268 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Reply by authors.J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):396. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.179. Epub 2012 Nov 20. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23174259 No abstract available.
-
Reply by authors.J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):775. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.272. Epub 2012 Dec 20. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23260565 No abstract available.
-
Reply by Authors.J Urol. 2021 Feb;205(2):343. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001419. Epub 2020 Oct 9. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33035143 No abstract available.
-
An update on holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and why it has stood the test of time.Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Jan;21(1):31-5. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834120d7. Curr Opin Urol. 2011. PMID: 21099689 Review.
-
Bipolar, Monopolar, Photovaporization of the Prostate, or Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: How to Choose What's Best?Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Aug;43(3):377-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.006. Urol Clin North Am. 2016. PMID: 27476130 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
