Clinical validation of the olfactory detection threshold module of the Snap & Sniff® olfactory test system
- PMID: 31283113
- DOI: 10.1002/alr.22377
Clinical validation of the olfactory detection threshold module of the Snap & Sniff® olfactory test system
Abstract
Background: Quantitative olfactory testing is essential to determine the validity and nature of a patient's complaint, accurately monitor changes in function over time (including influences of pharmacological, surgical, or immunological interventions), detect malingering, and establish disability compensation. This work describes the clinical validation of an advanced rapid odor detection threshold test that standardizes odorant delivery and eliminates unsanitary sniff bottles, the need for blindfolds, and the possibility of touching an odorant stimulus to the nose.
Methods: Snap & Sniff® single-staircase phenyl ethyl alcohol detection thresholds (S&S-Ts) were assessed bilaterally in 736 patients with chemosensory complaints; 421 received both bilateral and unilateral testing. The results were correlated with scores from the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and the Smell Threshold Test (STT), a widely-used standardized threshold test. Test-retest reliability data were obtained for 50 patients.
Results: S&S-Ts were highly reliable (Spearman r = 0.84), correlated with the other olfactory test measures (rs > 0.65, ps < 0.0001), and required significantly shorter administration times than the STT (<10 minutes). Bilateral thresholds were systematically lower than unilateral thresholds, a phenomenon independent of presentation order but dependent upon the better functioning side of the nose. The S&S-Ts were sensitive to age and sex. No systematic left:right nasal side threshold differences were evident.
Conclusion: The present study validates the use of Snap & Sniff® technology in the clinic setting. High test-retest reliability and brief administration times were evident. The S&S-T test allows for a reliable, valid, inexpensive, and rapid clinical means for quantitatively assessing human olfactory sensitivity.
Keywords: age; anosmia; hyposmia; odor detection; olfaction; psychophysics; reliability; sex differences; threshold; validity.
© 2019 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
References
-
- Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav. 1984;32:489-502.
-
- Cain WS, Gent J, Catalanotto FA, Goodspeed RB. Clinical evaluation of olfaction. Amer J Otolaryngol. 1983;4:252-256.
-
- Wright HN. Characterization of olfactory dysfunction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113:163-168.
-
- Doty RL. Measurement of chemosensory function. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;4:11-28.
-
- Doty RL, Crastnopol B. Correlates of chemosensory malingering. Laryngoscope 2010;120:707-711.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical