[Robot-assisted Whipple resection; results of the first 100 procedures in the Netherlands]
- PMID: 31283118
[Robot-assisted Whipple resection; results of the first 100 procedures in the Netherlands]
Abstract
Objective: Investigation into the results of robot-assisted Whipple resection in the Netherlands. These results were compared with those of open Whipple procedures on the basis of recent large case series of patients.
Design: Case series of patients and systematic literature review.
Method: We carried out a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data on the first 100 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted Whipple procedures in the period from March 2016 until March 2018 at the Erasmus MC, the Maasstad hospital or the Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht. We were mainly interested in surgery characteristics and postoperative outcomes. We compared our results with those of case series of patients with more than 500 open Whipple procedures carried out in a single hospital, published in the last 5 years.
Results: There were one or more serious complications in 22 patients (22%) and 2 patients (2%) developed multiple organ failure. 7 patients (7%) underwent reoperation. There was no postoperative mortality. In 14 case series (n = 12,708), complications occurred in 38% of patients and 7% of patients underwent reoperation. Mean mortality rate was 3%.
Conclusion: Our findings show that robotic Whipple procedures can be carried out safely in the Netherlands. The number of complications and mortality rates are comparable with results of large case series of patients who underwent open Whipple procedures in a centre of expertise.
Similar articles
-
Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):1147-1155. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002810. Ann Surg. 2019. PMID: 29771723
-
[Robot-assisted Pylorus-Preserving Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Kausch-Whipple Procedure)].Zentralbl Chir. 2016 Apr;141(2):139-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1568423. Epub 2016 Apr 13. Zentralbl Chir. 2016. PMID: 27074208 German.
-
Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study.J Robot Surg. 2016 Mar;10(1):33-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0558-z. Epub 2016 Jan 25. J Robot Surg. 2016. PMID: 26809755 Free PMC article.
-
[Place of partial nephrectomy assisted by robot: Review of the literature at the time of a request for a specific nomenclature].Prog Urol. 2018 Dec;28(16):890-899. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Oct 2. Prog Urol. 2018. PMID: 30290985 Review. French.
-
Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):468-478. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30217304
Cited by
-
Impact of complications after resection of pancreatic cancer on disease recurrence and survival, and mediation effect of adjuvant chemotherapy: nationwide, observational cohort study.BJS Open. 2023 Mar 7;7(2):zrac174. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac174. BJS Open. 2023. PMID: 36959099 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources