Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;27(8):1539-1545.
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2926543. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

Statistical Model of Motor-Evoked Potentials

Statistical Model of Motor-Evoked Potentials

Stefan M Goetz et al. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are widely used for biomarkers and dose individualization in transcranial stimulation. The large variability of MEPs requires sophisticated methods of analysis to extract information fast and correctly. Development and testing of such methods relies on the availability for realistic models of MEP generation, which are presently lacking. This paper presents a statistical model that can simulate long sequences of individualized MEP amplitude data with properties matching experimental observations. The MEP model includes three sources of trial-to-trial variability: excitability fluctuations, variability in the neural and muscular pathways, and physiological and measurement noise. It also generates virtual human subject data from statistics of population variability. All parameters are extracted as statistical distributions from experimental data from the literature. The model exhibits previously described features, such as stimulus-intensity-dependent MEP amplitude distributions, including bimodal ones. The model can generate long sequences of test data for individual subjects with specified parameters or for subjects from a virtual population. The presented MEP model is the most detailed to date and can be used for the development and implementation of dosing and biomarker estimation algorithms for transcranial stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(A) MEP amplitude model structure. Statistical distribution of (B) inter-individual (p1,ip5,i) and (C) intra-individual (εymult,ij, εxadd,ij, εyadd,ij) parameters to represent, respectively, the spread of MEP features in the subject population and trial-to-trial variability.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Model-generated IO curves of two virtual subjects, including 500 uniformly distributed samples and corresponding average sigmoid curve (A and C), and 100,000 samples at a single stimulation strength point within the curve slope (B and D). These examples illustrate previously described MEP features such as approximately lognormal distribution around the threshold (B) and locally bimodal distribution around the threshold (D).

References

    1. Thielscher A and Kammer T, “Electric field properties of two commercial figure-8 coils in TMS: calculation of focality and efficiency,” Clinical Neurophysiology vol. 115, pp. 1697–1708, 2004. - PubMed
    1. Stewart LM, Walsh V, and Rothwell JC, “Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 39, pp. 415–419, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Kammer T, Beck S, Erb M, and Grodd W, “The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 112, pp. 2015–2021, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Battelli L, Black KR, and Wray SH, “Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual area V5 in migraine,” Neurology, vol. 58, pp. 1066–1069, 2002. - PubMed
    1. Áfra J, Mascia A, Phy PG, de Noordhout AM, and Schoenen J, “Interictal cortical excitability in migraine: A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor and visual cortices,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 44, pp. 209–215, 1998. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources