Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 7;9(7):428.
doi: 10.3390/ani9070428.

Perceptions on Health Benefits of Guide Dog Ownership in an Austrian Population of Blind People with and without a Guide Dog

Affiliations

Perceptions on Health Benefits of Guide Dog Ownership in an Austrian Population of Blind People with and without a Guide Dog

Lisa Maria Glenk et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Blindness has previously been associated with impaired quality of life (QOL). Guide dogs may not only support blind people in their independency, but also facilitate social relationships and overall health. This study sought to investigate whether blind people from Austria with a guide dog, when compared with blind people without a guide dog, differ in their QOL, annual medical costs, and attitudes towards the human-guide dog relationship. Participants (n = 36) filled out an online accessible questionnaire that consisted of the World Health Organization (WHO)QOL-BREF and additional self-designed questions. Guide dog ownership was not associated with a better QOL. However, yearly medical cost expenditures were descriptively lower in guide dog owners, who were also more likely to believe that guide dogs can increase their independency and exert positive effects on health. Moreover, guide dog owners more likely considered a guide dog as a family member than non-guide dog owners. Although within the framework of this study, owning a guide dog was not significantly associated with increased QOL, some differences between the groups regarding health beliefs, attitude towards the dog, and relationship with the dog were identified. Accounting for the emerging prevalence of visual impairment, further research into this topic is warranted.

Keywords: attitude; blind people; dog ownership; guide dog; health; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. WHO WHO QOL Measuring Quality of Life. [(accessed on 23 February 2019)];1997 Available online: https://www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf.
    1. Borofsky I., Rowan A. Models for measuring quality of life: Implications for human-animal interaction research. In: Wilson C.C., Turner D.C., editors. Companion Animals in Human Health. SAGE Publications; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 1998. pp. 91–102.
    1. Albrecht G.L., Devlieger P.J. The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Soc. Sci. Med. 1999;48:977–988. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00411-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamelska A., Mazurek K. The Assessment of the Quality of Life in Visually Impaired People with Different Level of Physical Activity. Physical Culture and Sport. Stud. Res. 2015;67:31–41. doi: 10.1515/pcssr-2015-0001. - DOI
    1. Veenhoven R. The four qualities of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. J. Happiness Stud. 2000;1:1–39. doi: 10.1023/A:1010072010360. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources