Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;11(5):1788-1798.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.25.

Clinical factors affecting the survival of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic malignant pleural effusion, treated with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy or chemical talc pleurodesis: a monocentric, prospective, randomized trial

Affiliations

Clinical factors affecting the survival of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic malignant pleural effusion, treated with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy or chemical talc pleurodesis: a monocentric, prospective, randomized trial

Athanasios Kleontas et al. J Thorac Dis. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: There is a plethora of treatment algorithms for managing patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs), sharing many common points and principles. Our study aims to compare hyperthermic intrapleural chemotherapy (HITHOC) and talc pleurodesis (TALC), as treatment options for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic MPE.

Methods: This prospective, randomized trial was conducted at a single thoracic surgery center, the "Theagenio" Cancer Institute, in Greece, under the identification code NCT01409551 and was completed. All 40 patients enrolled were adults with histologically proven metastatic, unilateral, MPE caused by NSCLC. Exclusion criteria included patients >80 years, trapped lung, and major comorbidities. Patients were randomly and equally assigned 1:1 to either HITHOC (group A) or TALC (group B) by video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). The primary outcome was the median overall survival (OS) from trial intervention to death, while secondary outcome was the identification of clinical factors affecting the survival.

Results: The patients were followed up for 45 months. The OS of the full group was 8 months (95% CI: 7.046-8.954). Participants who underwent HITHOC had an OS of 8 months (95% CI: 7.141-8.859), whereas the participants of TALC had an OS of 9 months (95% CI: 7.546-10.454), with no significant difference between groups. Among fifty-four factors that were tested for their effects on survival, only TNM stage and creatinine values both preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively could be regarded as risk-factors for survival. Other recorded parameters, which had significant variance between the two groups, were urea levels, C-reactive protein, white blood cells and total in hospital length of stay (LOS).

Conclusions: Both HITHOC and TALC are equally effective and safe therapeutic options in treating patients with MPE and NSCLC with acceptable survival. The study revealed independent clinical risk factors influencing survival, which could be utilized as starting points for larger clinical studies.

Keywords: Pleurodesis; pleural effusion; malignant; carcinoma; non-small cell lung; hyperthermia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier plot for the full group of participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier plot for the groups A (HITHOC) and B (TALC).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic plot for Cox proportional hazards model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Between-groups comparison of urea levels preoperatively and post-operatively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Within-group comparison of C-reactive protein levels in group B (TALC) preoperatively and post-operatively (7th day).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Between-groups comparison of white blood cells levels preoperatively and post-operatively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Between-groups comparison of length of hospital stay (LOS). LOS is equal to total days of fluid drainage because all patients discharged the next day after chest drain removal.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, et al. BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010;65 Suppl 2:ii32-40. 10.1136/thx.2010.136994 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnston WW. The malignant pleural effusion. A review of cytopathologic diagnoses of 584 specimens from 472 consecutive patients. Cancer 1985;56:905-9. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4<905::AID-CNCR2820560435>3.0.CO;2-U - DOI - PubMed
    1. Froudarakis ME. Pleural effusion in lung cancer: more questions than answers. Respiration 2012;83:367-76. 10.1159/000338169 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Villena Garrido V, Cases Viedma E, Fernández Villar A, et al. Recommendations of diagnosis and treatment of pleural effusion. Update. Arch Bronconeumol 2014;50:235-49. - PubMed
    1. Zarogoulidis K, Zarogoulidis P, Darwiche K, et al. Malignant pleural effusion and algorithm management. J Thorac Dis 2013;5 Suppl 4:S413-9. - PMC - PubMed