Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Oct;97(10):404-413.
doi: 10.1111/avj.12859. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

Bovine digital dermatitis in Victoria, Australia

J Hesseling  1 , A R Legione  2 , M A Stevenson  3 , C I McCowan  4 , M F Pyman  2 , C Finochio  2 , D Nguyen  2 , C L Roic  2 , O L Thiris  2 , A J Zhang  2 , G van Schaik  1 , J E Coombe  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Bovine digital dermatitis in Victoria, Australia

J Hesseling et al. Aust Vet J. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Aims: The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of digital dermatitis (DD) in Victoria, Australia, and to investigate which organisms are consistent with typical DD lesions. The prevalence and causative pathogens of DD are not clear yet in Australia and this paper is one of the first to explore these questions in this country.

Methods: Examination and sampling of limbs was undertaken at three knackeries in Victoria, Australia. Limbs were classified as normal (N), active DD-lesion (A), dried or chronic DD-lesion (D) or suspected case of DD (S). A total of 823 cows were examined. Six skin biopsies were taken at each knackery, from which DNA was extracted for diversity profiling. Histochemical staining of samples was performed on eight of the skin biopsies.

Results: DD was detected in 29.8% of all cows. The prevalence of DD was significantly higher in dairy cows (32.2%) than in beef cows (10.8%). The differential abundance of Treponema-species was significantly increased in dried lesions, compared with the normal skin biopsies. Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Tenericutes were found to be significantly different in abundance in the DD lesions compared with normal skin biopsies. Silver staining of samples showed only mild inflammation and in two samples organisms with morphology consistent with Spirochaetes were detected.

Conclusions: The calculated prevalence indicates that DD is present in Victoria, Australia. The results of diversity profiling showed that the presence of Treponema-species was significantly different between the samples of DD lesions and normal skin.

Keywords: Digital dermatitis; Treponema; diversity profiling; silver staining; south-east Australia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bruijnis, MRN, Beerda, B, Hogeveen, H et al. Assessing the welfare impact of foot disorders in dairy cattle by a modeling approach. Anim. Int. J. Anim. Biosci. 2012;6:962-970
    1. Cheli, R & Mortellaro, CM. Digital dermatitis in cattle. In: Proc 8th Int Meet Cattle 8. Milan, Italy 1974:208-213
    1. Amory, JR, Barker, ZE, Wright, JL et al. Associations between sole ulcer, white line disease and digital dermatitis and the milk yield of 1824 dairy cows on 30 dairy cow farms in England and Wales from February 2003-November 2004. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008;83:381-391
    1. Cha, E, Hertl, JA, Bar, D et al. The cost of different types of lameness in dairy cows calculated by dynamic programming. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010;97:1-8
    1. Garbarino, EJ, Hernandez, JA, Shearer, JK et al. Effect of lameness on ovarian activity in postpartum holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004;87:4123-4131

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources