Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Aug;33(8):643-655.
doi: 10.1177/1545968319860483. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Camila Bonin Pinto et al. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background. Although recent evidence has shown a new role of fluoxetine in motor rehabilitation, results are mixed. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with fluoxetine increases upper limb motor function in stroke. Methods. Twenty-seven hemiparetic patients within 2 years of ischemic stroke were randomized into 3 groups: Combined (active rTMS + fluoxetine), Fluoxetine (sham rTMS + fluoxetine), or Placebo (sham rTMS + placebo fluoxetine). Participants received 18 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS in the unaffected primary motor cortex and 90 days of fluoxetine (20 mg/d). Motor function was assessed using Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function (JTHF) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scales. Corticospinal excitability was assessed with TMS. Results. After adjusting for time since stroke, there was significantly greater improvement in JTHF in the combined rTMS + fluoxetine group (mean improvement: -214.33 seconds) than in the placebo (-177.98 seconds, P = 0.005) and fluoxetine (-50.16 seconds, P < 0.001) groups. The fluoxetine group had less improvement than placebo on both scales (respectively, JTHF: -50.16 vs -117.98 seconds, P = 0.038; and FMA: 6.72 vs 15.55 points, P = 0.039), suggesting that fluoxetine possibly had detrimental effects. The unaffected hemisphere showed decreased intracortical inhibition in the combined and fluoxetine groups, and increased intracortical facilitation in the fluoxetine group. This facilitation was negatively correlated with motor function improvement (FMA, r2 = -0.398, P = 0.0395). Conclusion. Combined fluoxetine and rTMS treatment leads to better motor function in stroke than fluoxetine alone and placebo. Moreover, fluoxetine leads to smaller improvements than placebo, and fluoxetine's effects on intracortical facilitation suggest a potential diffuse mechanism that may hinder beneficial plasticity on motor recovery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02208466.

Keywords: cortical excitability; fluoxetine; motor recovery; recovery of function; stroke; transcranial magnetic stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflict of Interest

Dr. Lin served as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim from 2017–2018. No conflicts of interest reported by other authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study visits outline: V1: Screening; V2: Baseline assessments (Day 0), study medication given; V3 (2 weeks after V2): daily rTMS sessions begin; V13: Day 30 assessments; V14– 21: 8 weekly rTMS sessions; V22: Day 90 assessments. HDRS = Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; FMA = Fugl-Meyer Assessment; JTHF = Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function; BDI = Beck’s Depression Inventory; MAS = Modified Ashworth Scale; TMS = Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; rTMS = repetitive TMS; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flowchart

References

    1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2018 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mayo Nancy E, Sharon Wood-Dauphinee, Sara Ahmed, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21(5–6):258–268. doi:10.1080/096382899297684 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hatem SM, Saussez G, della Faille M, et al. Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Front Hum Neurosci 2016;10(September):1–22. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150–4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Libr 2014;(11). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data