Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):673.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5836-5.

Effectiveness of a therapeutic patient education program in improving cancer pain management: EFFADOL, a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial

Virginie Prevost  1   2 , Natacha Heutte  3 , Alexandra Leconte  3 , Idlir Licaj  4   3 , Claire Delorme  5   6 , Bénédicte Clarisse  3 ; EFFADOL-Group
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of a therapeutic patient education program in improving cancer pain management: EFFADOL, a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial

Virginie Prevost et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Despite numerous guidelines, nearly one of two patients with cancer pain remains undertreated, thereby affecting their quality of life. Active patient involvement through Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) is considered as a relevant strategy to overcoming hurdles in pain management. The aim of the EFFADOL study is to assess the effectiveness of a TPE program in improving cancer pain management.

Methods/design: The EFFADOL study is a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. A total of 260 cancer patients with unbalanced background pain will be randomised over the institutional level, i.e. stepped-wedge cluster design. Six clusters will be formed, one at the regional level of "Basse-Normandie" for patients receiving the educational approach by health providers already trained to TPE. Then, five additional centers will be gradually included at the national level, making it possible to compare the "conventional" management of pain (before medical staff training to TPE) with the educational approach (after being trained). The main study parameter is pain interference on daily life assessed with the self-administrated and validated Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire. Secondary objectives comprised the evaluation of patients' adherence to pain education program, the description of pain intensity, pain relief, analgesic adherence and pain emotional impact. Educational dimension of the program will be evaluated through the patients' acquisition of knowledge and skills about their pain and treatment as well as their self-efficacy to participate actively in pain management. The patient's feeling of pain changes will be measured. Finally, the satisfaction of participants and educators will be reported. We hypothetise active involvement of patients in TPE will lead to an improved pain management compared to standard care.

Discussion: Analyzing the impact of a TPE program in cancer pain patients will improve their pain management and quality of life. We expect that the dissemination of our project educational approach through the French territory will be accompanied by long term change in clinical practices with mutual benefit to patients and caregiver-educators.

Trial registration: NCT03297723 , registered: 09/28/2017. Protocol version: Version n°1.1 dated from 2016/09/08.

Keywords: Pain cancer; Pain management; Patient education; Quality of life; Stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of the stepped-wedge design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study flowchart. Abbreviations: PEP Pain Education Program
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Expected distribution of patients according to the stepped-wedge design
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Portenoy RK, Ahmed E. Principles of opioid use in cancer pain. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1662–1670. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5188. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ, Hochstenbach LMJ, Joosten EAJ, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Janssen DJA. Update on prevalence of pain in patients with Cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2016;51:1070–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kroenke K, Theobald D, Wu J, Loza JK, Carpenter JS, Tu W. The association of depression and pain with health-related quality of life, disability, and health care use in cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;40:327–341. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greco MT, Roberto A, Corli O, Deandrea S, Bandieri E, Cavuto S, et al. Quality of cancer pain management: an update of a systematic review of undertreatment of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:4149–4154. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.0383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ward SE, Goldberg N, Miller-McCauley V, Mueller C, Nolan A, Pawlik-Plank D, et al. Patient-related barriers to management of cancer pain. Pain. 1993;52:319–324. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90165-L. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data