Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):460.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4224-9.

A mixed-methods evaluation of the MOREOB program in Ontario hospitals: participant knowledge, organizational culture, and experiences

Affiliations

A mixed-methods evaluation of the MOREOB program in Ontario hospitals: participant knowledge, organizational culture, and experiences

Jessica Reszel et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: MOREOB (Managing Obstetrical Risk Efficiently) is a patient safety program for health care providers and administrators in hospital obstetric units. MOREOB has been implemented widely in Canada and gradually spread to the United States. The main goal of MOREOB is to build a patient safety culture and improve clinical outcomes. In 2013, 26 Ontario hospitals voluntarily accepted provincial funding to participate in MOREOB. The purpose of our study was to assess the effect of MOREOB on participant knowledge, organizational culture, and experiences implementing and participating in the program at these 26 Ontario hospitals.

Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods study in Ontario, Canada, with MOREOB participants from 26 hospitals. The quantitative component used a descriptive pre-post repeated measures design to assess participant knowledge and perception of culture, administered pre-MOREOB and after each of the three MOREOB modules. Changes in mean scores were assessed using mixed-effects regression. The qualitative component used a qualitative descriptive design with individual semi-structured interviews. We used content analysis to code, categorize, and thematically describe data. A convergent parallel design was used to triangulate findings from data sources.

Results: 308 participants completed the knowledge test, and 329 completed the culture assessment at all four time points. Between baseline and post-Module 3, statistically significant increases on both scores were observed, with an increase of 7.9% (95% CI: 7.1 to 8.8) on the knowledge test and an increase of 0.45 (on a scale of 1-5, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.52) on the culture assessment. Interview participants (n = 15) described improvements in knowledge, interprofessional communication, ability to provide safe care, and confidence in skills. Facilitators and barriers to program implementation and sustainability were identified.

Conclusions: Participants were satisfied with their participation in the MOREOB program and perceived that it increased health care provider knowledge and confidence, improved safety for patients, and improved communication between team members. Additionally, mean scores on knowledge tests for obstetric content and culture assessment improved. The MOREOB program can help organizations and individuals improve care by concentrating on the human and organizational aspects of patient safety. Further work to improve program implementation and sustainability is required.

Keywords: Obstetrics and gynecology; Patient safety; Qualitative research; Safety culture; Surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Quantitative and qualitative data sources
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participant flow diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Least square mean estimates and standard errors for Knowledge Tests (a), Culture Assessment Survey (b). *Pairwise statistical significance at the 1% level. **Differences in Knowledge Test are assessed as mean difference on score from 0 to 100, differences in Culture Assessment Survey scores are assessed as mean differences on score from 1 to 5
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Organization of themes and sub-themes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Statistics Canada. Births, 2015 and 2016. Ottawa; 2018. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/daily-quotidien/180430/dq180430f-eng..... Accessed 12 June 2019.
    1. Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI). Giving birth in Canada: a regional profile. Ottawa; 2004. https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/GBC2004_regional_e.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2019
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. Perinatal health indicators for Canada 2017. Ottawa; 2017. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/aspc-phac/HP7-1-20.... Accessed 8 Apr 2019.
    1. Liu S, Joseph KS, Bartholomew S, Fahey J, Lee L, Allen AC, et al. Temporal trends and regional variations in severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 2003 to 2007. J Obs Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:847–855. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34656-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources