Where there is no nurse: an observational study of large-scale mentoring of auxiliary nurses to improve quality of care during childbirth at primary health centres in India
- PMID: 31289071
- PMCID: PMC6615817
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027147
Where there is no nurse: an observational study of large-scale mentoring of auxiliary nurses to improve quality of care during childbirth at primary health centres in India
Abstract
Objective: Clinician scarcity in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC) often results in de facto task shifting; this raises concerns about the quality of care. This study examines if a long-term mentoring programme improved the ability of auxiliary nurse-midwives (ANMs), who function as paramedical community health workers, to provide quality care during childbirth, and how they compared with staff nurses.
Design: Quasi-experimental post-test with matched comparison group.
Setting: Primary health centres (PHC) in the state of Bihar, India; a total of 239 PHCs surveyed and matched analysis based on 190 (134 intervention and 56 comparison) facilities.
Participants: Analysis based on 335 ANMs (237 mentored and 98 comparison) and 42 staff nurses (28 mentored and 14 comparison).
Intervention: Mentoring for a duration of 6-9 months focused on nurses at PHCs to improve the quality of basic emergency obstetric and newborn care.
Primary outcome measures: Nurse ability to provide correct actions in managing cases of normal delivery, postpartum haemorrhage and neonatal resuscitation assessed using a combination of clinical vignettes and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.
Results: Mentoring increased correct actions taken by ANMs to manage normal deliveries by 17.5 (95% CI 14.8 to 20.2), postpartum haemorrhage by 25.9 (95% CI 22.4 to 29.4) and neonatal resuscitation 28.4 (95% CI 23.2 to 33.7) percentage points. There was no significant difference between the average ability of mentored ANMs and staff nurses. However, they provided only half the required correct actions. There was substantial variation in ability; 41% of nurses for normal delivery, 60% for postpartum haemorrhage and 45% for neonatal resuscitation provided less than half the correct actions. Ability declined with time after mentoring was completed.
Discussion: Mentoring improved the ability of ANMs to levels comparable with trained nurses. However, only some mentored nurses have the ability to conduct quality deliveries. Continuing education programmes are critical to sustain quality gains.
Keywords: health policy; obstetrics; primary care; quality In health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: AG and AD are employees of CARE—Bihar, the agency that designed and implemented the AMANAT programme.
Figures
References
-
- Sample Registration System. Special bulletin on maternal mortality in india 2014-16. 2018. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Bulletins/MMR%20Bulle... (Accessed 3 Feb 2019).
-
- World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva, 2015. www.who.int/about/licensing/.
-
- International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey-4 2015-16 – India fact sheet. Mumbai http://rchiips.org/nfhs/pdf/NFHS4/India.pdf (Accessed Apr 28 2018).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources