Tomographic evaluation of dentoskeletal changes due to the treatment of class II malocclusion with Forsus appliance
- PMID: 31289716
- PMCID: PMC6593311
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.06.005
Tomographic evaluation of dentoskeletal changes due to the treatment of class II malocclusion with Forsus appliance
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated dentoalveolar skeletal changes promoted by the Forsus appliance, associated to fixed orthodontic appliance, in the correction of Class II, division 1 malocclusion, from Computed Tomography (CT).
Methods: sample consisted of 10 youngsters (7 males and 3 females), with a mean age of 13.86 years. Two Forsus® models were installed after the alignment and leveling phase of the teeth. Two tomographic images of each patient, T1 and T2 (initial and immediately after removal of Forsus® appliance) were done to perform the anatomical tracings and obtain the variables of interest. The data were described by means and standard deviations. For the comparison between the initial and final phases, the paired "t" test was used and a significance level of 5% was considered (p < 0.05).
Results: small skeletal changes were observed, such as posterior maxillary displacement and a slight mandibular growth. Larger dentoalveolar changes occurred as extrusion, retrusion and lingualization of upper incisors; Intrusion, protrusion and vestibularization of the lower incisors; Mesialization and extrusion of lower molars.
Conclusion: Considering the patients evaluated in this study, Forsus® presented similar results to other mandibular propulsion appliances, with dentoalveolar effects that favored Class II correction, however, with very slight skeletal modifications.
Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; Corrective orthodontics; Malocclusion.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion.Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):413-9. doi: 10.2319/051314-345.1. Epub 2014 Oct 3. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 25279724 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment effects of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD EZ and Herbst appliances: A retrospective clinical study.Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):306-14. doi: 10.2319/040315-225.1. Epub 2015 Aug 10. Angle Orthod. 2016. PMID: 26258899 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy Between Forsus and Advansync Fixed Functional Appliance for the Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.Cureus. 2023 Jan 5;15(1):e33399. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33399. eCollection 2023 Jan. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36751211 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular propulsion appliance for adults with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2020 Apr 1;42(2):163-173. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz089. Eur J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 31786599
-
Eruption guidance appliance: a review.Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014 Jun;15(2):163-6. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014. PMID: 25102468 Review.
Cited by
-
Clear aligner mandibular advancement in growing patients with Class II malocclusion.AJO DO Clin Companion. 2023 Apr;3(2):93-109. doi: 10.1016/j.xaor.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 25. AJO DO Clin Companion. 2023. PMID: 37636594 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Angelieri F., de Almeida R.R., Janson G., Castanha Henriques J.F., Pinzan A. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(6):572–579. - PubMed
-
- Heinig N., Goz G. Clinical application and effects of the Forsus spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop. 2001;62(6):436–450. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources