Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 2:4:87.
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15298.2. eCollection 2019.

A realist review of community engagement with health research

Affiliations

A realist review of community engagement with health research

Bipin Adhikari et al. Wellcome Open Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Community engagement is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of global health. Recent years have seen an expansion of community engagement activities linked to health research, but debates and inconsistencies remain about the aims of different types of engagement, mechanisms underpinning their implementation and impact, and influential contextual factors. Greater commitment to and consistency around community engagement by health research programs, implementers and funders requires a more coherent evidence base. This realist review is designed to improve our understanding of how and why community engagement contributes to intended and unintended outcomes (including research and ethical outcomes) in different contexts. Given the breadth and diversity of the literature on community engagement in health research, the review will initially focus on malaria research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and draw on wider global health literature where needed. Methods and analysis: Community engagement in practice is often a complex set of interventions. We will conduct a realist review - a theory driven approach to evidence synthesis - to provide explanations for how and why community engagement with health research produces the pattern of outcomes observed across different contexts of application. We will consolidate evidence from a range of documents, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies. The review will follow several stages: devising an initial programme theory, searching evidence, selecting appropriate documents, extracting data, synthesizing and refining the programme theory, and reiteration of these steps as needed. Ethics and dissemination: A formal ethics review is not required for this literature review. Findings will be disseminated in a peer reviewed journal, through national and international conferences, and through a set of short briefings tailored for audiences with an interest in community engagement. Outputs and presentations will be informed by and feed into our network of community engagement experts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019125687.

Keywords: community engagement; health research; low and middle income countries; malaria research; realist review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Robin Vincent has worked in a consultancy advisory capacity for the Wellcome trust around support for evaluation of community engagement and development of community engagement strategies.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Example mechanism.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Review team and stakeholder input.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Initial programme theory visualisation.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Simplified programme theory for consultations.

References

    1. CIOMS: International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans.2016; (Accessed 29th August, 2018). Reference Source - PubMed
    1. Dickert N, Sugarman J: Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1123–1127. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.058933 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. King KF, Kolopack P, Merritt MW, et al. : Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:84. 10.1186/1472-6939-15-84 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tindana PO, Singh JA, Tracy CS, et al. : Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2007;4(9):e273. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium: Principles of Community Engagement.NIH Publication No 11–7782. 2nd edition.2011. Reference Source

LinkOut - more resources