Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 26;3(1):162-168.
doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0101. eCollection 2019.

Survey of Women Physicians' Experience with Elected Leadership Positions

Affiliations

Survey of Women Physicians' Experience with Elected Leadership Positions

Sasha K Shillcutt et al. Health Equity. .

Abstract

Purpose: Women physicians do not advance in academic promotion or leadership at the same rate as their male counterparts. One factor contributing to academic promotion and advancement is the experience of serving in elected leadership positions. Although >400 women are running for political office in 2018, fewer than a handful are physicians and there has never been a woman physician elected to the Congress. Yet, little is known about women physicians who run for elected positions within their institutions, medical/professional societies, or government. This study sought to examine how women physicians experience elections using a cross-sectional survey of women physicians to gain insight into patterns of reported experiences and perceived barriers to elected leadership positions. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study of 1221 women physicians. Results: 43.8% (N=535) of women physicians ran for an elected office from high school through medical school graduation, in contrast to only 16.7% (N=204) after graduating from medical school. Only 8.5% of women physicians surveyed reported a boss or supervisor encouraged them to run for an elected position. Conclusion: Women physicians are less likely to run for elected positions and for those with previous election experience, the most common barriers cited were lack of institutional time and support, experience, and mentorship.

Keywords: elections; gender equity; leadership; women in medicine; women physicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.K.S.: Owner of Brave Enough LLC. S.P., S.D., R.G., R.S., L.M.G., R.P., H.B., J.K.S.: No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Drop-off of women physicians running for elected positions.
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Reported data on women physicians running for elected positions in their institutions, medical/professional societies, and government.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM, Raezer CL, et al. . The state of women in academic medicine: the pipeline and pathways to leadership. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2014.
    1. Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, et al. . Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. JAMA 2015;314:1149–1158 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boiko JR, Anderson AJ, Gordon RA. Representation of women among academic grand rounds speakers. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:72–724 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Cherla DV, et al. . Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1865–1875 - PubMed
    1. Raj A, Carr PL, Kaplan SE, et al. . Longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic productivity among medical faculty across 24 medical schools in the United States. Acad Med. 2016;91:1074–1079 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources