Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;28(10):1642-1651.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1358. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

Positive STAT5 Protein and Locus Amplification Status Predicts Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy to Assist Clinical Precision Management of Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Positive STAT5 Protein and Locus Amplification Status Predicts Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy to Assist Clinical Precision Management of Prostate Cancer

Bassem R Haddad et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Background: A significant fraction of prostate cancer patients experience post-radical prostatectomy (RP) biochemical recurrence (BCR). New predictive markers are needed for optimizing postoperative prostate cancer management. STAT5 is an oncogene in prostate cancer that undergoes amplification in 30% of prostate cancers during progression.

Methods: We evaluated the significance of a positive status for nuclear STAT5 protein expression versus STAT5 locus amplification versus combined positive status for both in predicting BCR after RP in 300 patients.

Results: Combined positive STAT5 status was associated with a 45% disadvantage in BCR in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in all Gleason grade patients. Patients with Gleason grade group (GG) 2 and 3 prostate cancers and combined positive status for STAT5 had a more pronounced disadvantage of 55% to 60% at 7 years after RP in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, including the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical nomogram (CAPRA-S) variables, combined positive STAT5 status was independently associated with a shorter BCR-free survival in all Gleason GG patients (HR, 2.34; P = 0.014) and in intermediate Gleason GG 2 or 3 patients (HR, 3.62; P = 0.021). The combined positive STAT5 status improved the predictive value of the CAPRA-S nomogram in both ROC-AUC analysis and in decision curve analysis for BCR.

Conclusions: Combined positive status for STAT5 was independently associated with shorter disease-free survival in univariate analysis and was an independent predictor for BCR in multivariate analysis using the CAPRA-S variables in prostate cancer.

Impact: Our results highlight potential for a novel precision medicine concept based on a pivotal role of STAT5 status in improving selection of prostate cancer patients who are candidates for early adjuvant interventions to reduce the risk of recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
STAT5 protein levels and STAT5 locus amplification in prostate cancer tissue microarrays. A: Individual prostate cancer (PC) tissue microarray (TMA) cores were scored for nuclear STAT5a/b levels, detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), on a scale from 0 to 3, where 0 represented negative, 1 weak, 2 moderate and 3 strong immunostaining (top panel). B: STAT5A/B FISH analysis of PC TMA cores (bottom panel). The top row shows representative sections from 5 cases showing no STAT5 locus amplification. Most cells show 2 copies of STAT5A/B (red signal). A chromosome 17 centromeric probe was used (green signal) as a control. The bottom row shows representative sections from 4 cases with STAT5 locus amplification. Arrows point to cells with STAT5 locus amplification.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Univariate analysis of the combined status for both STAT5 gene locus amplification status and protein expression and progression-free survival with biochemical recurrence (BCR) as the endpoint in prostate cancers of all Gleason GG (A) vs. prostate cancers of Gleason GG 2 and 3 (B) vs. GG 4 and 5 (C). Univariate analysis of the STAT5 gene locus amplification status and progression-free survival in prostate cancers of all Gleason Grade Groups (GG) (D) vs prostate cancers of Gleason GG 2 and 3 (E) vs GG 4 and 5 (F). Univariate analysis of the STAT5 protein status and progression-free survival in prostate cancers of all Gleason Grade Groups (GG) (G) vs. prostate cancers of Gleason GG 2 and 3 (H) vs. GG 4 and 5 (I). Kaplan Meier curves, with global p-values calculated by Mantel-Haenszel tests. The STAT5 protein status detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and STAT5 locus amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Global Mantel-Haenszel log-rank p-values were calculated comparing the difference in survival between all patient groups.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Receiver-operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and decision curve analyses (DCA). A: ROC-AUC and (B) DCA of CAPRA-S with and without the combined positive STAT5 status in the entire cohort, and a separate sub-analysis of Gleason GG 2 and 3 PC patients exclusively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Attard G, Parker C, Eeles RA, Schroder F, Tomlins SA, Tannock I, et al. Prostate cancer. Lancet 2016;387(10013):70–82 doi 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61947-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grossfeld GD, Latini DM, Lubeck DP, Mehta SS, Carroll PR. Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 2003;169(1):157–63 doi 10.1097/01.ju.0000036470.57520.a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, Magi-Galluzzi C, et al. A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. Eur Urol 2016;69(3):428–35 doi 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Fondurulia J, Chen MH, Tomaszewski JE, et al. The combination of preoperative prostate specific antigen and postoperative pathological findings to predict prostate specific antigen outcome in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1998;160(6 Pt 1):2096–101. - PubMed
    1. Walz J, Chun FK, Klein EA, Reuther A, Saad F, Graefen M, et al. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2009;181(2):601–7; discussion 7–8 doi 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.033. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances