Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e024505.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024505.

Women with physical disability in pregnancy resident education: a national survey as a needs assessment for curriculum improvement in obstetrics and gynaecology in Canada

Affiliations

Women with physical disability in pregnancy resident education: a national survey as a needs assessment for curriculum improvement in obstetrics and gynaecology in Canada

Gharid Nourallah Bekdache et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the current status to which Canadian obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob-Gyn) programmes teach residents about pregnancy in patients with physical disabilities, and to assess the level of interested in providing formal education sessions in this field. This study also assesses the residents' perception of their knowledge and their comfort level caring for women with physical disabilities (WWPD), which will further determine the need for incorporation of this topic into the residency curriculum.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: All Canadian English accredited Ob-Gyn residency programmes.

Participants: Programme directors and residents.

Main outcome measures: The current self-reported education and exposure Canadian Ob-Gyn residents have surrounding WWPD in pregnancy, and if there is an interest in further education in this area.

Methods: An online survey was developed and distributed to all Canadian English accredited Ob-Gyn residency programme directors and residents. Answers were collected over a 2-month period in 2017, which consisted of an initial email and two email reminders. Questions were in three key areas: demographic characteristics, knowledge gap and level of interest in a formal method of education.

Results: Eighty-four residents and nine programme directors participated in the surveys. Eighty-six per cent of residents and all programme directors responded that there are no formal scheduled training sessions on WWPD as part of the residency curriculum. Two-thirds of the residents reported being uncomfortable with the management issues surrounding a woman with a disability in pregnancy. A vast majority of residents (91.67%) and all programme directors have an interest in incorporating this topic into the residency curriculum to meet the need of pregnant women with disabilities.

Conclusions: This survey indicated that there is both a need for and interest in education in the area of pregnancy and physical disability in the Canadian Ob-Gyn residency programme. This information suggests that the development of educational materials in this area should be considered to address an unmet need with the ultimate goal of improving the care provided to WWPD in pregnancy. Future projects in this area should focus on content development taking into account the CanMEDS and competency-based medical education framework.

Keywords: curriculum; needs assessment; physical disability; pregnancy; resident education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AB: reports grants from Sunnybrook AFP grant and grant from University of Toronto Department of Neurology New Initiatives Program, both grants are outside the submitted work: Sunnybrook AFP grant: Funding for other non-related trial entitled ’High Volume Foleys increasing Vaginal Birth feasibility trial' and University of Toronto Department of Neurology New Initiatives Program: Funding for other non-related study ’A Patient-Oriented study on Pregnancy in Myasthenia Gravis'.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Resident’s formal method of education on the topic of WWPD in pregnancy. WWPD, women with physical disabilities.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Informal education on the topic of pregnancy and physical disability.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Resident’s comfort level with the management of WWPD in pregnancy. WWPD, women with physical disabilities.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Resident’s formal education interest in physical disabilities in pregnancy.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution of interested Residents by training level and gender.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Programme directors’ interest level in formal education.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Metzler M. Statistics Canada. Table 2: Prevalence of disability by age and sex group, Canada, 2012. In Disability in Canada: Initial findings from the Canadian Survey on Disability. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-654-x/20013002-eng.htm.
    1. World Health Organization. InternationalClassification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
    1. Malouf R, Redshaw M, Kurinczuk JJ, et al. . Systematic review of heath care interventions to improve outcomes for women with disability and their family during pregnancy, birth and postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:58 10.1186/1471-2393-14-58 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malouf R, Henderson J, Redshaw M. Access and quality of maternity care for disabled women during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period in England: data from a national survey. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016757 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016757 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iezzoni LI, Wint AJ, Smeltzer SC, et al. . Effects of disability on pregnancy experiences among women with impaired mobility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94(2):133–40. 10.1111/aogs.12544 - DOI - PMC - PubMed