Effect of Spermatic Nuclear Quality on Live Birth Rates in Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
- PMID: 31293326
- PMCID: PMC6594123
- DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_81_18
Effect of Spermatic Nuclear Quality on Live Birth Rates in Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
Abstract
Background: Our study defines the clinical role of sperm DNA damage in the assisted reproductive technology procedure.
Aim: To investigate if the compaction of chromatin explored added to the analysis of the sperm DNA fragmentation allows obtaining a new indicator for sperm genome quality linked to live birth rate (LBR).
Design: This was a prospective study, undergoing 101 cycles in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) program.
Materials and methods: The sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) has been measured with sperm chromatin dispersion examination. The sperm decondensation index (SDI) of chromatin has been measured with aniline blue procedure; with these indexes, a new parameter has been created: DFI × SDI.
Statistical analysis: Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student's t-test, and Chi-square test were used. The quantitative variables were described as mean ± standard deviation. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed with live birth as outcome.
Results: The sperm concentration, motility, and normal morphology were lower when the DFI was high (P = 0.001). The fertilization rates and the number of obtained embryos were not statistically significant different according to the DFI groups. The SDI does not appear to be linked either with the spermatic parameters or with the ICSI parameters. A low DFI seems to be a beneficial factor to obtain a live birth in ICSI procedure (P = 0.064). In case of high DFI, a high SDI allows to obtain a higher LBR than a low SDI.
Conclusion: The DFI is a good prognostic for a delivery rate in ICSI procedure, and the SDI could be added to DFI to create a new parameter of sperm nuclear quality. This new parameter seems to be linked to LBR.
Keywords: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; live birth rate; sperm DNA fragmentation; sperm chromatin condensation.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
The influence and mechanistic action of sperm DNA fragmentation index on the outcomes of assisted reproduction technology.Open Life Sci. 2023 May 19;18(1):20220597. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0597. eCollection 2023. Open Life Sci. 2023. PMID: 37215498 Free PMC article.
-
Sperm DNA fragmentation index, as measured by sperm chromatin dispersion, might not predict assisted reproductive outcome.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;57(4):493-498. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.06.003. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30122567
-
[Pre-implantation genetic screening in intracytoplasmic sperm injection for infertile patients with high sperm DNA fragmentation index].Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2018 Janurary;24(1):39-44. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2018. PMID: 30157358 Chinese.
-
Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates.Fertil Steril. 2008 Aug;90(2):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Sep 27. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17904130 Review.
-
Sperm DNA fragmentation index influences assisted reproductive technology outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis combined with a retrospective cohort study.Andrologia. 2019 Jul;51(6):e13263. doi: 10.1111/and.13263. Epub 2019 Mar 5. Andrologia. 2019. PMID: 30838696
Cited by
-
Random sperm DNA fragmentation index is not associated with clinical outcomes in day-3 frozen embryo transfer.Asian J Androl. 2022 Jan-Feb;24(1):109-115. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_17_21. Asian J Androl. 2022. PMID: 33835076 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive Significance of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing in Early Pregnancy Loss in Infertile Couples Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.Res Rep Urol. 2021 Jun 1;13:313-323. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S315300. eCollection 2021. Res Rep Urol. 2021. PMID: 34104637 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Benchaib M, Lornage J, Mazoyer C, Lejeune H, Salle B, François Guerin J, et al. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:93–100. - PubMed
-
- Simon L, Proutski I, Stevenson M, Jennings D, McManus J, Lutton D, et al. Sperm DNA damage has a negative association with live-birth rates after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:68–78. - PubMed
-
- Lewis SE, John Aitken R, Conner SJ, Iuliis GD, Evenson DP, Henkel R, et al. The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27:325–37. - PubMed
-
- Simon L, Emery BR, Carrell DT. Review: Diagnosis and impact of sperm DNA alterations in assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;44:38–56. - PubMed
-
- Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, et al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1039–49. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources