Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 26:10:722.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00722. eCollection 2019.

A Danshensu-Tetramethylpyrazine Conjugate DT-010 Overcomes Multidrug Resistance in Human Breast Cancer

Affiliations

A Danshensu-Tetramethylpyrazine Conjugate DT-010 Overcomes Multidrug Resistance in Human Breast Cancer

Xinhua Zhou et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: We previously demonstrated that a Danshensu-Tetramethylpyrazine conjugate DT-010 enhanced anticancer effect of doxorubicin (Dox) in Dox-sensitive human breast cancer cells, and protected against Dox-induced cardiotoxicity. This work was designed to see whether DT-010 overcomes Dox resistance in resistant human breast cancer cells. Methods: The effects of DT-010, Dox or their combination on cell viability of Dox-resistant human breast cancer MCF-7/ADR cells were conducted using 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry after Annexin V-FITC/PI co-staining. Dox accumulation in MCF-7/ADR cells was detected by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. A fluorometric multidrug resistance (MDR) assay kit was used to evaluate the effect of DT-010 on MDR transporter activity. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression and activity were analyzed by Western blot and rhodamine 123 (Rh123) efflux assay, respectively. The effects of DT-010 on glycolysis and mitochondrial stress were detected using an Extracellular Flux Analyzer. A Succinate Dehydrogenase Activity Assay kit was used to measure mitochondrial complex II activity. Results: At non-cytotoxic concentrations, DT-010 in combination with Dox led to a significant growth inhibition of MCF-7/ADR cells, suggesting a synergy between DT-010 and Dox to reverse Dox resistance. DT-010 restored Dox-mediated apoptosis and p53 induction in MCF-7/ADR cells. DT-010 increased Dox accumulation in MCF-7/ADR cells via inhibiting P-gp activity, but without changing P-gp expression. Further studies showed that DT-010 significantly inhibited glycolysis and mitochondrial function of MCF-7/ADR cells. Mitochondrial complex II activity was inhibited by DT-010 or DT-010/Dox combination, but not by Dox. The DT-010-mediated suppression of metabolic process may render cells more vulnerable to Dox treatment and thus result in enhanced efficacy. Conclusions: The results indicate that DT-010 overcomes Dox resistance in human breast cancer cells through a dual action via simultaneously inhibiting P-gp-mediated drug efflux and influencing metabolic process.

Keywords: P-glycoprotein; breast cancer; danshensu; glycolysis; resistance; tetramethylpyrazine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Structures of Danshensu (DSS), tetramethylpyrazine (TMP), and DT-010. A bulky hindrance was introduced on the linker between DSS and TMP. (B and C) Cell viability of MCF-7 and MCF-7/ADR cells after treatment of Dox, DT-010, or their combinations for 24 h. Cell viability was determined using 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Results are displayed as mean ± SD. (D) Colony formation of MCF-7/ADR cells after treatment of Dox (2 μM), DT-010 (10 μM) or their combinations for 7 days. Cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet, with colony number counted. Results are displayed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, compared to control group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
DT-010 restored Dox-mediated apoptosis in MCF-7/ADR cells. (A) MCF-7/ADR cells were treated with Dox (2 μM), DT-010 (20 μM) or the combination for 24 h, followed by flow cytometric analysis after PI/Annexin-V staining. Early apoptosis rate was calculated based on population of PI−/Annexin-V+ cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Results were displayed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, compared with control or other groups. (B) Western blot was performed using cell lysate of MCF-7/ADR cells after treatment of Dox (2 μM), DT-010 (20 μM) or the combination for 24 h. Anti-GAPDH was used as loading control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
DT-010 increased Dox concentration in MCF-7/ADR cells. MCF-7/ADR cells were pretreated with DT-010 (0, 5, 10, and 20 μM) for 12 h, followed by incubated with Dox (2 μM) for another 4 h. The intracellular concentration of Dox was analyzed by flow cytometry (A) and observed using Incell Analyzer 2000 (GE Healthcare) (B). MCF-7 cells treated with Dox (2 μM) for 4 h were used for a comparison. Mean fluorescence intensity were recorded in flow cytometry assay. Relative fluorescence intensity (nuclear area) of Dox over Hoechst 33342 was calculated by ImageJ. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, compared with MCF-7 cells. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.001, compared with Dox alone in MCF-7/ADR cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of DT-010 on expression and activity of P-gp. (A) Relative messenger RNA expression of ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCG2, and SLC22A16 in MCF-7 and MCF-7/ADR cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, compared with MCF-7 cells. (B) Multidrug resistance (MDR) transporter activity was detected using a fluorometric MDR assay kit. MCF-7/ADR cells were treated with DT-010 (5, 10, and 20 μM) for 1 h, followed by the addition of 100 μl MDR dye-loading solution and incubated at 37°C for another 1 h. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, or **p < 0.01, compared with control. (C) DT-010 (20 μM), Dox (2 μM), or their combination did not affect P-gp expression in MCF-7/ADR cells. Western blot was performed, with anti-GAPDH as loading control. (D and E) The effect of DT-010 on P-gp substrate efflux activity was assessed. MCF-7/ADR cells (5.0 × 104/well) were incubated with the P-gp-specific fluorescent substrate Rh123 at 0.5 μg/ml with or without DT-010 (20 μM) for 1 h, then washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and incubated in Rh123-free medium at 37°C for additional 1 h with or without DT-010. Cells were analyzed on flow cytometry to detect Rh123 fluorescence. The PSC-833 (0.1 μM) was used as a positive control. MCF-7 cells were used for confirmation of overexpression of P-gp (increased Rh123 efflux) in MCF-7/ADR cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5
DT-010 inhibited glycolytic pathway of MCF-7/ADR cells. The extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) was measured with XF24 extracellular flux analyzer after 12 h of DT-010 treatment (A). The basal glycolysis (B), glycolytic capacity (C), and glycolytic reserve (D) of MCF-7/ADR cells were calculated. *p < 0.05, compared with DT-010-treated group.
Figure 6
Figure 6
DT-010 inhibited mitochondrial respiration of MCF-7/ADR cells. MCF-7/ADR cells were treated with DT-010 for 12 h, the effects of DT-010 on OCR were monitored with XF24 extracellular flux analyzer (A). The basal respiration (B), ATP production (C) and maximal respiration (D) of MCF-7/ADR cells were calculated. *p < 0.05, compared with DT-010-treated group.
Figure 7
Figure 7
DT-010 inhibited mitochondrial complex II activity in MCF-7/ADR cells. Cells were treated with DT-010 (20 μM), Dox (2 μM), or their combination for 12 h, and complex II activity was measured by Succinate Dehydrogenase Activity Assay kit. *p < 0.05, compared with control. # p < 0.05, compared to DT-010-treated group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alves A., Mamede A. C., Alves M., Oliveira P. F., Rocha S. M., Botelho F., et al. (2019). Glycolysis inhibition as a strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment? Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 19, 26–40. 10.2174/1568009618666180430144441 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharya B., Low S. H., Soh C., Kamal M. N., Beloueche-Babari M., Koh K. X., et al. (2014). Increased drug resistance is associated with reduced glucose levels and an enhanced glycolysis phenotype. Br. J. Pharmacol. 171, 3255–3267. 10.1111/bph.12668 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ganapathy-Kanniappan S., Geschwind J. F. (2013). Tumor glycolysis as a target for cancer therapy: progress and prospects. Mol. Cancer 12, 152. 10.1186/1476-4598-12-152 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang S., Zou Z., Nie P., Wen R., Xiao Y., Tang J. (2015). Synergistic effects between mTOR complex 1/2 and glycolysis inhibitors in non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells. PLoS One 10, e0132880. 10.1371/journal.pone.0132880 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kao T. K., Ou Y. C., Kuo J. S., Chen W. Y., Liao S. L., Wu C. W., et al. (2006). Neuroprotection by tetramethylpyrazine against ischemic brain injury in rats. Neurochem. Int. 48, 166–176. 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.10.008 - DOI - PubMed