Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 21:10:1444.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01444. eCollection 2019.

It's Been a Hard Day's Night and I've Been Working Like a Dog: Workaholism and Work Engagement in the JD-R Model

Affiliations

It's Been a Hard Day's Night and I've Been Working Like a Dog: Workaholism and Work Engagement in the JD-R Model

Benedicte Langseth-Eide. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The study investigates if the job-demands resources (JD-R) model could be improved by including workaholism in its health impairment process. Salient predictors and antecedents of workaholism and work engagement are identified in a sample of 12170 employees at Norwegian universities and university colleges. Structural equation modeling suggested that job demands and job resources relate to workaholism and work engagement, respectively. The results also revealed that both workaholics and work-engaged employees put in more hours at work than was expected of them. We found that workaholism was negatively related to work-related health, whereas work engagement was positively related to work-related health. These findings support the notion of workaholism and work engagement as two different forms of working hard. Finally, we tested the buffer hypothesis that job resources would moderate the effect of job demands on workaholism. The moderations were in the expected direction, but effect sizes were weaker than those typically reported in previous investigations. In conclusion, the present study supports the expansion of including workaholism in the JD-R model.

Keywords: ARK; JD-R model; KIWEST; employee well-being; work engagement; work-related health; workaholism; working hard.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The study model including the hypotheses (H1 to H5) and direction of effect. PWR Health, perceived work-related health.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The study model for testing the interaction hypotheses. JRs, job resources; JDs, job demands; WA, workaholism.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
SEM model. Standardized solution. All paths are statistically significant at p < 0.001. TC, task completion; SC, social community; GC, goal clarity; ITs, illegitimate tasks; ICs, interpersonal conflicts; RCs, role conflicts; PWR Health, perceived work-related health.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The interaction effects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albrecht S. L. (2011). Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    1. Amagasa T., Nakayama T., Takahashi Y. (2005). Karojisatsu in Japan: characteristics of 22 cases of work-related suicide. J. Occup. Health 47 157–164. 10.1539/joh.47.157 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreassen C. S., Griffiths M. D., Hetland J., Pallesen S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale. Scand. J. Psychol. 53 265–272. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnetz B. B. (2005). Subjective indicators as a gauge for improving organizational well-being. An attempt to apply the cognitive activation theory to organizations. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30 1022–1026. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.03.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babcock-Roberson M. E., Strickland O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. J. Psychol. 144 313–326. 10.1080/00223981003648336 - DOI - PubMed