Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 25:10:656.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00656. eCollection 2019.

Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?

Affiliations
Review

Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?

Mirja Krause et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and physical disability, with a global lifetime incidence rate of 1 in 6. Currently, the only FDA approved treatment for ischemic stroke is the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Stem cell clinical trials for stroke have been underway for close to two decades, with data suggesting that cell therapies are safe, feasible, and potentially efficacious. However, clinical trials for stroke account for <1% of all stem cell trials. Nevertheless, the resources devoted to clinical research to identify new treatments for stroke is still significant (53-64 million US$, Phase 1-4). Notably, a quarter of cell therapy clinical trials for stroke have been withdrawn (15.2%) or terminated (6.8%) to date. This review discusses the bottlenecks in delivering a successful cell therapy for stroke, and the cost-to-benefit ratio necessary to justify these expensive trials. Further, this review will critically assess the currently available data from completed stroke trials, the importance of standardization in outcome reporting, and the role of industry-led research in the development of cell therapies for stroke.

Keywords: cell therapy; clinical trial; clinical trial costs; stem cells; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Clinical trials-stem cells. (B) Clinical trials-stem cells + stroke.

References

    1. Ingall T. Stroke-incidence, mortality, morbidity and risk. J Insur Med. (2004) 36:143–52. - PubMed
    1. Martínez-Garza D, Cantú-Rodríguez O, Jaime-Pérez J, Gutiérrez-Aguirre C, Góngora-Rivera J, Gómez-Almaguer D. Current state and perspectives of stem cell therapy for stroke. Med Universit. (2016) 18:169–80. 10.1016/j.rmu.2016.07.005 - DOI
    1. Nagpal A, Choy FC, Howell S, Hillier S, Chan F, Hamilton-Bruce MA, et al. Safety and effectiveness of stem cell therapies in early-phase clinical trials in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. (2017) 8:191. 10.1186/s13287-017-0643-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teasell RW. Long-term sequelae of stroke: How should you handle stroke complications? Can Fam Physician. (1992) 38:381–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foundation S. The Economic Impact of Stroke in Australia. (2013). Available online at: https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/economic-impact... (accessed April 30, 2019).

LinkOut - more resources