Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun;11(Suppl 10):S1498-S1506.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.04.

Minimized extracorporeal circulation in non-coronary surgery

Affiliations
Review

Minimized extracorporeal circulation in non-coronary surgery

Andreas Liebold et al. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) technology is characterized by improved biocompatibility due to closed-loop design, minimized priming, and markedly reduced artificial surface. Despite well-evidenced clinical advantages in coronary surgery, MiECC penetration in complex open-heart surgery is low. Concerns have been raised by surgeons and perfusionist regarding safety of perfusion in situations when the heart is opened and air is entering the closed system. Moreover, issues of blood and volume management are deemed impractical without having a reservoir. In the evolution of MiECC safety aspects as well as means of air and volume management have been addressed. The integration of active air removal devices, and the possibility of venting and volume buffering made MiECC suitable for valvular or even more complex surgery. However, typical clinical benefits found with MiECC in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, in particular blood sparing effects, were not reproducible. Air handling and blood management remain the main issues of MiECC in non-coronary surgery. With the introduction of modular (type IV) MiECC systems containing a second, accessory circuit for immediate conversion to open cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the last obstacles seem to be cleared away. The first reports using this latest development in MiECC technology sound promising. It is now up to the cardiac surgical community to adopt this technology and produce data helping to answer the question whether MiECC is the best perfusion strategy for all comer's cardiac surgery.

Keywords: Minimally invasive; extracorporeal circulation; heart surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ulm University modular type IV MiECC system. The main circuit is primed with dye solution for better visualization. Not in the picture: soft bag for retrograde arterial and venous priming and volume buffering. (V, venous air removal device; R, hard-shell reservoir; P, centrifugal pump; O/F, membrane oxygenator with integrated arterial line filter; CP, cardioplegia line).

References

    1. Gibbon JH. Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 1954;37:171-85. - PubMed
    1. Cheng DC. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:215-52. 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Westaby S. Organ dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. A systemic inflammatory reaction initiated by the extracorporeal circuit. Intensive Care Med 1987;13:89-95. 10.1007/BF00254791 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy GJ, Angelini GD. Side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass: what is the reality? J Card Surg 2004;19:481-8. 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04101.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy JH, Tanaka KA. Inflammatory response to cardio- pulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:S715-20. 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04701-X - DOI - PubMed