Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;40(9):1546-1556.
doi: 10.1002/humu.23861. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants

Affiliations

Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants

Melissa S Cline et al. Hum Mutat. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Testing for variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (commonly referred to as BRCA1/2), has emerged as a standard clinical practice and is helping countless women better understand and manage their heritable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Yet the increased rate of BRCA1/2 testing has led to an increasing number of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), and the rate of VUS discovery currently outpaces the rate of clinical variant interpretation. Computational prediction is a key component of the variant interpretation pipeline. In the CAGI5 ENIGMA Challenge, six prediction teams submitted predictions on 326 newly-interpreted variants from the ENIGMA Consortium. By evaluating these predictions against the new interpretations, we have gained a number of insights on the state of the art of variant prediction and specific steps to further advance this state of the art.

Keywords: BRCA; BRCA1; BRCA2; CAGI; CAGI5; variant interpretation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Dendrogram illustrating the predictions on all variants by all prediction methods
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Shown is the performance of the fourteen blind prediction methods and three reference methods (denoted with R), for four selected performance metrics. The bar lengths and the error bars reflect the mean performance and standard deviation observed in random benchmarks, where each estimated probability was permuted according to standard deviation supplied by the predictor. No benchmarking was performed on methods for which the predictor supplied no standard deviation, or on the reference methods.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Of the four methods by the TransBioInf team, two (left) used predicted splicing information while two (right) did not. Further, the methods used two different learning frameworks and objective functions: neural network prediction of clinical significance (top), and multiple linear regression of functional assay scores (bottom). These boxplots show that in both architectures, including the splicing information improved prediction accuracy.

References

    1. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, & Sunyaev SR (2013). Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2 Current Protocols in Human Genetics / Editorial Board, Haines Jonathan L. … [et al.], Chapter 7, Unit7.20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calabrese R, Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Martelli PL, & Casadio R (2009). Functional annotations improve the predictive score of human disease-related mutations in proteins. Human Mutation, 30(8), 1237–1244. - PubMed
    1. Cao Y, Sun Y, Karimi M, Chen H, Moronfoye O, & Shen Y (2019). Predicting Pathogenicity of Missense Variants with Weakly Supervised Regression. Human Mutation. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casadio R, Vassura M, Tiwari S, Fariselli P, & Luigi Martelli P (2011). Correlating disease-related mutations to their effect on protein stability: a large-scale analysis of the human proteome. Human Mutation, 32(10), 1161–1170. - PubMed
    1. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, … Ruden DM (2012). A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly, 6(2), 80–92. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types