Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):231.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1568-6.

Growth of extremely low birth weight infants at a tertiary hospital in a middle-income country

Affiliations

Growth of extremely low birth weight infants at a tertiary hospital in a middle-income country

Tendai Mabhandi et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Survival of extremely low birth weight (ELBW; birth weight less than 1000 g) infants has improved significantly since the 1990s. Consequently, growth monitoring in ELBW infants has gained more relevance.

Methods: We conducted this study to describe the growth of ELBW infants at a tertiary hospital, to audit macronutrient intake and explore the association of prematurity complications with growth. This was a retrospective study on 92 ELBW infants born at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital. The association between good growth (regaining birth weight in 21 days or less and subsequent growth velocity > 15 g/kg/day) and complications of prematurity was explored.

Results: Only 11infants (13%) had a discharge weight above the 10th centile when the Fenton growth chart was used compared to 20 infants (22.4%) when the Intergrowth 21st Project growth standard was used. The mean weight velocity was 13.5 g/kg/day and the mean number of days to regain birth weight was 18.2 days. Factors associated with poor growth were late-onset sepsis, persistent patent ductus arteriosus, continuous positive airway pressure for more than 2 days, invasive ventilation, oxygen on day 28 and being kept nil per os. Protein and caloric intake correlate positively with growth velocity. Unlike the Fenton Growth Charts, use of the Intergrowth 21st Project growth standards revealed the association between neonatal factors and poor growth.

Conclusion: Growth outcome in infants is poor at 36 weeks postmenstrual age at our institution. Intergrowth 21st Project growth standards were superior to Fenton Growth Charts, however a multicentre study is required before adoption.

Keywords: Extremely low birth weight; Growth; Neonate; Nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Growth curve for females with standard deviation indicated for each mean weekly weight. Fenton Growth Chart and Intergrowth 21st Project centile lines shown as reference
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Growth curve for males with standard deviation indicated for each mean weekly weight. Fenton Growth Chart and Intergrowth 21st centile lines shown as reference

References

    1. Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH, Fanaroff AA, Kilpatrick S, LaCorte M, et al. Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991–1999. Paediatrics. 2002;110(1):143–151. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Niklasson A, Engström E, Hård A-L, Wikland KA, AJPr H. Growth in very preterm children: a longitudinal study. Pediatr Res. 2003;54:899–905. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000091287.38691.EF. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saigal S, Stoskopf BL, Streiner DL, Burrows EJP. Physical growth and current health status of infants who were of extremely low birth weight and controls at adolescence. Pediatrics. 2001;108:407–415. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.407. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelleher KJ, Casey PH, Bradley RH, Pope SK, Whiteside L, Barrett KW, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for failure to thrive in low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatrics. 1993;91(5):941–948. - PubMed
    1. Embleton NE, Pang N, Cooke RJJP. Postnatal malnutrition and growth retardation: an inevitable consequence of current recommendations in preterm infants? Pediatric. 2001;107(2):270–273. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.2.270. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms