Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):126.
doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0883-x.

Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Kai-Lin Huang  1   2 , Shih-Yuan Wang  1 , Wan-Chen Lu  1 , Ya-Hui Chang  1 , Jian Su  3   4 , Yen-Ta Lu  5   6
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Kai-Lin Huang et al. BMC Pulm Med. .

Abstract

Background: The Nelson mortality results were presented in September 2018. Four other randomized control trials (RCTs) were also reported the latest mortality outcomes in 2018 and 2019. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to update the evidence and investigate the benefits and harms of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in lung cancer screening.

Methods: Detailed electronic database searches were performed to identify reports of RCTs that comparing LDCT to any other type of lung cancer screening. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effects models.

Results: We identified nine RCTs (n = 97,244 participants). In pooled analyses LDCT reduced lung cancer mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.90, I2 = 1%) but had no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) confirmed the results of our meta-analysis. Subgroup defined by high quality trials benefitted from LDCT screening in reducing lung cancer mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.91, I2 = 7%), whereas no benefit observed in other low quality RCTs. LDCT was associated with detection of a significantly higher number of early stage lung cancers than the control. No significant difference (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30-1.33) was found in mortality after invasive procedures between two groups.

Conclusions: In meta-analysis based on sufficient evidence demonstrated by TSA suggests that LDCT screening is superiority over usual care in lung cancer survival. The benefit of LDCT is expected to be heavily influenced by the risk of lung cancer in the different target group (smoking status, Asian) being screened.

Keywords: LDCT; Low-dose computed tomography; Lung cancer screening; Meta-analysis; Mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram of study flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias summary for included studies reporting mortality (red shading denotes high risk of bias, yellow shading denotes some concerns and green denotes low risk of bias)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plots of comparisons between low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus no screening or chest radiology (CXR) for a lung cancer mortality b all-cause mortality
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM, Pasmantier MW, Smith JP, Miettinen OS. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1763–1771. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060476. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gareen IF, Duan F, Greco EM, Snyder BS, Boiselle PM, Park ER, Fryback D, Gatsonis C. Impact of lung cancer screening results on participant health-related quality of life and state anxiety in the National Lung Screening Trial. Cancer. 2014;120(21):3401–3409. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28833. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van den Bergh KA, Essink-Bot ML, Bunge EM, Scholten ET, Prokop M, van Iersel CA, van Klaveren RJ, de Koning HJ. Impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on participants in a randomized controlled trial (NELSON trial) Cancer. 2008;113(2):396–404. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu GX, Raz DJ, Brown L, Sun V. Psychological burden associated with lung cancer screening: a systematic review. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17(5):315–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms