Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jul 10;9(7):e025880.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025880.

Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Maria Melchior  1 , Aurélie Nakamura  1 , Camille Bolze  1 , Félix Hausfater  1 , Fabienne El Khoury  2 , Murielle Mary-Krause  1 , Marine Azevedo Da Silva  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Maria Melchior et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the effect of cannabis policy liberalisation (decriminalisation and legalisation) levels of use in adolescents and young adults.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Inclusion criteria: Included studies were conducted among individuals younger than 25 years and quantitatively assessing consequences of cannabis policy change. We excluded articles: (A) exclusively based on participants older than 25 years; (B) only reporting changes in perceptions of cannabis use; (C) not including at least two measures of cannabis use; (D) not including quantitative data; and (E) reviews, letters, opinions and policy papers. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science were searched through 1 March 2018.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent readers reviewed the eligibility of titles and abstracts and read eligible articles, and four authors assessed the risk of bias (Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies). Extracted data were meta-analysed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO.

Results: 3438 records were identified via search terms and four via citation lists; 2312 were retained after removal of duplicates, 99 were assessed for eligibility and 41 were included in our systematic review. 13 articles examined cannabis decriminalisation, 20 examined legalisation for medical purposes and 8 examined legalisation for recreational purposes. Findings regarding the consequences of cannabis decriminalisation or legalisation for medical purposes were too heterogeneous to be meta-analysed. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest a small increase in cannabis use among adolescents and young adults following legalisation of cannabis for recreational purposes (standardised mean difference of 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to -0.07). Nevertheless, studies characterised by a very low/low risk of bias showed no evidence of changes in cannabis use following policy modifications.

Conclusions: Cannabis policy liberalisation does not appear to result in significant changes in youths' use, with the possible exception of legalisation for recreational purposes that requires monitoring.

Trial registration number: CRD42018083950.

Keywords: adolescents; cannabis; marijuana; policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing the screening and selection process of articles selected for the study of the impact of liberalisation of cannabis policy with regard to levels of use in adolescents and young adults.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime. The world drug report 2016. New York: United Nations, 2016.
    1. Klieger SB, Gutman A, Allen L, et al. . Mapping medical marijuana: state laws regulating patients, product safety, supply chains and dispensaries, 2017. Addiction 2017;112:2206–16. 10.1111/add.13910 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Decriminalisation in Europe? Recent developments in legal approaches to drug use. European Legal Database on Drugs (ELDD) comparative study. European Legal Database on Drugs. Lisbon: EMCDDA, 2001.
    1. Mendiburo-Seguel A, Vargas S, Oyanedel JC, et al. . Attitudes towards drug policies in Latin America: results from a Latin-American Survey. Int J Drug Policy 2017;41:8–13. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohn AM, Johnson AL, Rose SW, et al. . Support for marijuana legalization and predictors of intentions to use marijuana more often in response to legalization among U.S. young adults. Subst Use Misuse 2017;52:203–13. 10.1080/10826084.2016.1223688 - DOI - PubMed