Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 26:10:778.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00778. eCollection 2019.

Individualized Monitoring of Muscle Recovery in Elite Badminton

Affiliations

Individualized Monitoring of Muscle Recovery in Elite Badminton

Vanessa Barth et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Individualized reference ranges for serum creatine kinase (CK) and urea are a promising tool for the assessment of recovery status in high-level endurance athletes. In this study, we investigated the application of this approach in racket sports, specifically for the monitoring of elite badminton players during the preparation for their world championships. Methods: Seventeen elite badminton players were enrolled of which 15 could be included in the final analysis. Repeated measurements of CK and urea at recovered (R) and non-recovered (NR) time points were used for the stepwise individualization of group-based, prior reference ranges as well as for the evaluation of classificatory performance. Specifically, blood samples were collected in the morning following a day off (R) or following four consecutive training days (NR), respectively. Group based reference ranges were derived from the same data. Error rates were compared between the group-based and individualized approaches using the Fisher exact test. Results: Error rates were numerically lower for the individualized as compared to the group-based approach in all cases. Improvements reached statistical significance for urea (test-pass error rate: p = 0.007; test-fail error rate: p = 0.002) but not for CK (p vs. group-based: test-pass error rate: p = 0.275, test-fail error rate: p = 0.291). Regardless of the chosen approach, the use of CK was associated with lower error rates as compared to urea. Conclusion and Practical Applications: Individualized reference ranges seem to offer diagnostic benefits in the monitoring of muscle recovery in elite badminton. The lack of significant improvements in error rates for CK is likely due to the large difference between R and NR for this parameter with error rates that are already low for the group-based approach.

Keywords: Bayesian; fatigue; recovery; reference range; sport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
General design.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Reference classification of time points. R, recovered; NR, non-recovered.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Criteria for data inclusion. R, recovered; NR, non-recovered.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Runs of the individualization procedure (exemplarily for six time points). For every run 4 recovered (R) and 4 non-recovered (NR) values were used in chronological order for the deduction of the individualized cut-off value which was then used to classify the following R and NR values. Values to be classified are marked dark gray, samples for learning are marked light gray.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Individual distributions of CK and urea levels.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Intra- and individual variabilities of CK and urea. Status: 1 = recovered, 2 = non-recovered.

References

    1. Bourdon T., Cardinale M., Murray A., Gastin P., Kellmann M., Varley M., et al. (2017). Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement. Int. J. Sports Phys. Perf. 12 S2161–S2170. - PubMed
    1. Hecksteden A., Pitsch W., Julian R., Pfeiffer M., Kellmann M., Ferrauti A., et al. (2017). A new method to individualize monitoring of muscle recovery in athletes. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 12 1137–1142. 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0120 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hecksteden A., Skorski S., Schwindling S., Hammes D., Pfeiffer M., Kellmann M., et al. (2016). Blood-borne markers of fatigue in competitive athletes - results from simulated training camps. PLoS One 11:e0148810. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148810 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kellmann M., Bertollo M., Bosquet L., Brink M., Coutts A. J., Duffield R., et al. (2018). Recovery and performance in sport: consensus statement. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 19 1–6. - PubMed
    1. Kellmann M., Kölling S. (2019). Recovery and Stress in Sport: A Manual for Testing and Assessment (England: Routledge; ).