Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;13(2):141-146.
doi: 10.1111/ases.12733. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

Endoscopic repair of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review

Affiliations

Endoscopic repair of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review

Angeliki Chorti et al. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is a severe complication. Except for re-operation, several endoscopic options have been proposed for the minimal invasive treatment of AL, including the endoluminal vacuum devices, tissue sealants and Over-The-Scope-Clip (OTSC) technique. The aim of the present review is to evaluate the effect of alternative treatment options for AL repair, by means of endoscopy.

Method: A bibliographic search was performed in the international literature. Ten case reports and series were finally included, reporting 75 cases of endoscopic repair of AL. A descriptive statistical analysis and a systematic review were performed.

Results: The patients' mean age was 65.84 ± 9.92 years (95% CI: 61.70-68.76), the male-to-female ratio being 1.5:1. The mean diameter of the cavity was 5.17 ± 3.32 cm (95% CI: 4.03-6.31). The mean time until the diagnosis was 44.15 ± 105.91 days (95% CI: 13.39-74.90). Vacuum-assisted closure therapy was the most common technique (52%), followed by fibrin glue (25.3%) and OTSC (22.7%). As supplementary therapy, OTSC was applied in 8.3%, vacuum-assisted closure in 25%, endoclips in 4.2%, while fibrin glue was the most frequently used (62.5%).

Conclusion: Endoscopic management of AL after low anterior resection is considered as an alternative to surgical treatment with promising results.

Keywords: OTSC; VAC; anastomotic leakage; endoscopic treatment; fibrin glue; low anterior resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Araujo-Miguez A, Sobrino-Rodriguez S, et al. A new perspective on vacuum-assisted closure for the treatment of anastomotic leak following low anterior resection for rectal cancer, is it worthy? Surg Innov. 2018;25(4):350-356.
    1. Chopra SS, Mrak K, Hünerbein M. The effect of endoscopic treatment on healing of anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surgery. 2009;145(2):182-188.
    1. Cong ZJ, Hu LH, Bian ZQ, et al. Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75519.
    1. Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Management of low colorectal anastomotic leak: preserving the anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7(12):378-383.
    1. Lippert E, Klebl FH, Schweller F, et al. Fibrin glue in the endoscopic treatment of fistulae and anastomotic leakages of the gastrointestinal tract. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(3):303-311.

Publication types