Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;61(6):1477-1492.
doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800313. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

A flexible design for advanced Phase I/II clinical trials with continuous efficacy endpoints

Affiliations

A flexible design for advanced Phase I/II clinical trials with continuous efficacy endpoints

Pavel Mozgunov et al. Biom J. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

There is growing interest in integrated Phase I/II oncology clinical trials involving molecularly targeted agents (MTA). One of the main challenges of these trials are nontrivial dose-efficacy relationships and administration of MTAs in combination with other agents. While some designs were recently proposed for such Phase I/II trials, the majority of them consider the case of binary toxicity and efficacy endpoints only. At the same time, a continuous efficacy endpoint can carry more information about the agent's mechanism of action, but corresponding designs have received very limited attention in the literature. In this work, an extension of a recently developed information-theoretic design for the case of a continuous efficacy endpoint is proposed. The design transforms the continuous outcome using the logistic transformation and uses an information-theoretic argument to govern selection during the trial. The performance of the design is investigated in settings of single-agent and dual-agent trials. It is found that the novel design leads to substantial improvements in operating characteristics compared to a model-based alternative under scenarios with nonmonotonic dose/combination-efficacy relationships. The robustness of the design to missing/delayed efficacy responses and to the correlation in toxicity and efficacy endpoints is also investigated.

Keywords: Phase I/II clinical trial; combination trial; continuous endpoint; nonmonotonic efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The logistic transformation (3) for (i) α=0,β=1 (dotted line), (ii) α=4.6,β=1 (dashed line) and (iii) α=4.6,β=1.5 (solid line)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of OBR selections under different combinations of toxicity and efficacy steps
Figure 3
Figure 3
The logistic transformation using the lowest efficacy bound pe=0.01 (solid line) and the lowest efficacy bound pe=0.50 (dashed line)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bekele, B. , & Shen, Y. (2005). A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a Phase I/II dose‐finding trial. Biometrics, 61, 343–354. - PubMed
    1. Cai, C. , Yuan, Y. , & Ji, Y. (2014). A bayesian Phase I/II design for oncology clinical trials of combining biological agents. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 63, 159–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheung, Y. K. (2005). Coherence principles in dose‐finding studies. Biometrika, 92, 863–873.
    1. Hirakawa, A. (2012). An adaptive dose‐finding approach for correlated bivariate binary and continuous outcomes in Phase I oncology trials. Statistics in Medicine, 31, 516–532. - PubMed
    1. Ivanova, A. , & Kim, S. H. (2009). Dose finding for continuous and ordinal outcomes with a monotone objective function: A unified approach. Biometrics, 65, 307–315. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources