Global Abortion Policies Database: A descriptive analysis of the regulatory and policy environment related to abortion
- PMID: 31300212
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.06.002
Global Abortion Policies Database: A descriptive analysis of the regulatory and policy environment related to abortion
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems states that regulatory, policy, and programmatic barriers that hinder access to and timely provision of safe abortion care should be removed. Although some regulatory requirements facilitate access, where they act as barriers, they can deter women from seeking safe abortion care. We use data available in the Global Abortion Policies Database as of February 2019 to review policies related to regulatory requirements identified as access barriers in the Safe abortion guidance. We include only countries where such policies apply, i.e., where abortion is lawful on the woman's request, with no requirement for justification and/or for one or more legal grounds. The results demonstrate the variation that exists in regulatory requirements, but little remains known about how they are implemented in practice and the implications on how women access and how providers offer safe abortion services.
Keywords: Abortion laws; Abortion policies; Abortion regulations; Lawful abortion.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion.BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0183-1. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018. PMID: 30572956 Free PMC article.
-
Global Abortion Policies Database: a new approach to strengthening knowledge on laws, policies, and human rights standards.BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0174-2. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018. PMID: 30208877 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Public Health Evidence in Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):155-156. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6839. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 27820613 Review. No abstract available.
-
Women, abortion and the new technical and policy guidance from WHO.Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Sep 1;90(9):712. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.107144. Epub 2012 Aug 15. Bull World Health Organ. 2012. PMID: 22984317 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007.Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008 Sep;34(3):110-20. doi: 10.1363/ifpp.34.110.08. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008. PMID: 18957353 Review.
Cited by
-
The effectiveness of stem cell‑derived extracellular vesicles therapy for intrauterine adhesions: a meta-analysis of preclinical studies.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Aug 13;23(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01448-2. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40804676 Free PMC article.
-
History and scientific background on the economics of abortion.PLoS One. 2021 Sep 13;16(9):e0257360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257360. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34516575 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of COVID-19 on safe abortion access in Africa: An analysis through a framework of reproductive justice and lens of structural violence.Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Sep 23;3:958710. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.958710. eCollection 2022. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36247111 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion beyond a medical issue; women's perception on the current Ethiopian abortion law among reproductive-aged women by 2023, a community-based cross-sectional study.Health Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;7(8):e2314. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2314. eCollection 2024 Aug. Health Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39139461 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):1232. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13620-z. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35725439 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical