Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Aug;25(3):255-259.
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

Accuracy of appendicular radiographic image interpretation by radiographers and junior doctors in Ghana: Can this be improved by training?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Accuracy of appendicular radiographic image interpretation by radiographers and junior doctors in Ghana: Can this be improved by training?

B B Ofori-Manteaw et al. Radiography (Lond). 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Access to image interpretation in Ghana remains a challenge with the limited number of radiologists. Radiographers with the right skills and knowledge in image interpretation could help address this challenge. The aims of the study were to determine and compare the ability (accuracy, sensitivity and specificity) of radiographers and junior doctors in interpreting appendicular trauma radiographs both before and after training.

Methods: An action research study involving a pre and post training test was carried out to determine the level of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in abnormality detection by radiographers after undergoing training when compared to junior doctors. Eight radiographers and twelve junior doctors were invited to interpret an image bank of 30 skeletal radiographs, both before and upon completion of an educational program. The participants' tests were scored against a reference standard provided by an experienced radiologist. Pre and post-test analysis were carried out for comparison.

Results: Post training mean accuracy (radiographers 83.3% vs 68.8%, p = 0.017; doctors 81.9% vs 71.6%, p = 0.003), sensitivity (radiographers 83.3% vs 69.2%, p = 0.042; doctors 77.2% vs 67.8% p = 0.025) and specificity (radiographers 83.3% vs 68.3%, p = 0.011; doctors 86.7% vs 75.6% p = 0.005) of both groups significantly improved. No significant differences were recorded between the radiographers and doctors after the training event.

Conclusion: The study revealed that, with a well-structured training program, radiographers and junior doctors could improve on their accuracies in radiographic abnormality detection and commenting on trauma radiographs.

Keywords: Appendicular skeleton; Image interpretation; Junior doctors; Radiographers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources