Keratinocytes protect soft-tissue integration of dental implant materials against bacterial challenges in a 3D-tissue infection model
- PMID: 31302293
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.015
Keratinocytes protect soft-tissue integration of dental implant materials against bacterial challenges in a 3D-tissue infection model
Abstract
The soft-tissue seal around dental implants protects the osseo-integrated screw against bacterial challenges. Surface properties of the implant material are crucial for implant survival against bacterial challenges, but there is no adequate in vitro model mimicking the soft-tissue seal around dental implants. Here, we set up a 3D-tissue model of the soft-tissue seal, in order to establish the roles of oral keratinocytes, gingival fibroblasts and materials surface properties in the protective seal. To this end, keratinocytes were grown on membrane filters in a transwell system, while fibroblasts were adhering to TiO2 surfaces underneath the membrane. In absence of keratinocytes on the membrane, fibroblasts growing on the TiO2 surface could not withstand challenges by commensal streptococci or pathogenic staphylococci. Keratinocytes growing on the membrane filters could withstand bacterial challenges, but tight junctions widened to allow invasion of bacteria to the underlying fibroblast layer in lower numbers than in absence of keratinocytes. The challenge of this bacterial invasion to the fibroblast layer on the TiO2 surface negatively affected tissue integration of the surface, demonstrating the protective barrier role of keratinocytes. Streptococci caused less damage to fibroblasts than staphylococci. Importantly, the protection offered by the soft-tissue seal appeared sensitive to surface properties of the implant material. Integration by fibroblasts of a hydrophobic silicone rubber surface was affected more upon bacterial challenges than integration of more hydrophilic hydroxyapatite or TiO2 surfaces. This differential response to different surface-chemistries makes the 3D-tissue infection model presented a useful tool in the development of new infection-resistant dental implant materials. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Failure rates of dental implants due to infection are surprisingly low, considering their functioning in the highly un-sterile oral cavity. This is attributed to the soft-tissue seal, protecting the osseo-integrated implant part against bacterial invasion. The seal consists of a layer of keratinocytes covering gingival fibroblasts, integrating the implant. Implant failure involves high patient discomfort and costs of replacing an infected implant, which necessitates development of improved, infection-resistant dental implant materials. New materials are often evaluated in mono-culture, examining bacterial adhesion or tissue interactions separately and neglecting the 3D-structure of the tissue seal. A 3D-tissue model allows to study new materials in a more relevant way, in which interactions between keratinocytes, gingival fibroblast, bacteria and materials surfaces are accounted for.
Keywords: Co-culture; Dental implants; Infection; Soft-tissue seal; Staphylococci; Streptococci; Tight junctions.
Copyright © 2019 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Soft tissue integration versus early biofilm formation on different dental implant materials.Dent Mater. 2014 Jul;30(7):716-27. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 29. Dent Mater. 2014. PMID: 24793200
-
Osteoblast integration of dental implant materials after challenge by sub-gingival pathogens: a co-culture study in vitro.Int J Oral Sci. 2015 Dec 18;7(4):250-8. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2015.45. Int J Oral Sci. 2015. PMID: 26674427 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence of human oral keratinocytes and gingival fibroblasts to nano-structured titanium surfaces.BMC Oral Health. 2014 Jun 21;14:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-75. BMC Oral Health. 2014. PMID: 24952379 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for Optimizing the Soft Tissue Seal around Osseointegrated Implants.Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 Oct;6(20). doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700549. Epub 2017 Sep 27. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017. PMID: 28960892 Review.
-
Surface modification strategies to reinforce the soft tissue seal at transmucosal region of dental implants.Bioact Mater. 2024 Sep 10;42:404-432. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.042. eCollection 2024 Dec. Bioact Mater. 2024. PMID: 39308548 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Biomimetic structural design in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Mater Today Bio. 2025 Mar 14;32:101664. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101664. eCollection 2025 Jun. Mater Today Bio. 2025. PMID: 40206144 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jul 27;11:1193204. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1193204. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37576997 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unraveling the Applicability of LbL Coatings for Drug Delivery in Dental Implant-Related Infection Treatment.ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025 Jan 13;11(1):13-32. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01037. Epub 2024 Nov 30. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025. PMID: 39614932 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Osteoimmune regulation underlies oral implant osseointegration and its perturbation.Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 24;13:1056914. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1056914. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 36761175 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Citric Acid in the Passivation of Titanium Dental Implants: Corrosion Resistance and Bactericide Behavior.Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 12;15(2):545. doi: 10.3390/ma15020545. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35057263 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials