Different risks of nodal metastasis by tumor location in remnant gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer
- PMID: 31302790
- DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-00989-x
Different risks of nodal metastasis by tumor location in remnant gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Abstract
Background: Curative surgery for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) after gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) can be challenging. We examined the risk factors for lymph node metastasis in RGC, especially for tumors located at the greater curvature (G) or non-greater curvature (NG), to determine the appropriate indications of curative surgery.
Methods: Data from the two high-volume centers of Japan between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 137 patients enrolled in this study, 34 were classified as the G group and 103 as the NG group. The incidence of lymph node metastasis and its risk factors was evaluated.
Results: Lymph node metastasis was observed in 21.2% (29/137), including 38.2% (13/34) in the G group and 15.5% (16/103) in the NG group (p = 0.008). A logistic regression analysis showed that tumor location of G or NG (p = 0.042), tumor size (p = 0.002) and depth of invasion (p = 0.009) were significant independent risk factors for nodal metastasis. Risk classification using these factors showed that clinical T1-T2 with a maximum size < 35 mm located at the non-greater curvature had the lowest nodal metastatic risk (4.3%).
Conclusions: Tumor location at the G or NG was a significant risk factor for nodal metastasis in RGC. When selecting curative surgery for RGC, physicians should consider the nodal metastatic risk calculated by the tumor location, size and depth of invasion.
Keywords: Initial gastrectomy for gastric cancer; Nodal metastasis; Remnant gastric cancer.
Similar articles
-
Different prognostic effect of lymph node metastasis between remnant gastric cancers and primary proximal gastric cancers.J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct;28(10):1571-1577. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.06.026. Epub 2024 Jul 2. J Gastrointest Surg. 2024. PMID: 38964532
-
[Risk factor analysis and prediction model establishment of lymph node metastasis in remnant gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 May 25;21(5):541-545. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29774936 Chinese.
-
[Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with poorly differentiated early gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 May 25;22(5):446-450. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.05.010. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31104430 Chinese.
-
Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.Am Surg. 2007 Apr;73(4):359-66. Am Surg. 2007. PMID: 17439029 Review.
-
Current status in remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 28;22(8):2424-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i8.2424. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 26937131 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Microfluidic printed 3D bioactive scaffolds for postoperative treatment of gastric cancer.Mater Today Bio. 2023 Dec 12;24:100911. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100911. eCollection 2024 Feb. Mater Today Bio. 2023. PMID: 38188649 Free PMC article.
-
Tumor Location Causes Different Recurrence Patterns in Remnant Gastric Cancer.J Gastric Cancer. 2022 Oct;22(4):369-380. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e29. J Gastric Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36316111 Free PMC article.
-
The epigenetic modifier lysine methyltransferase 2C is frequently mutated in gastric remnant carcinoma.J Pathol Clin Res. 2023 Sep;9(5):409-422. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.335. Epub 2023 Jul 3. J Pathol Clin Res. 2023. PMID: 37395342 Free PMC article.
-
Silencing circ_0043256 inhibited CoCl2-induced proliferation, migration, and aerobic glycolysis in gastric cancer cells.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84548-0. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39748101 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous