Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;189(1):11-26.
doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02060-1. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

Social inclusion in the Irish health context: Policy and stakeholder mapping

Affiliations
Review

Social inclusion in the Irish health context: Policy and stakeholder mapping

Patrick O'Donnell et al. Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Social inclusion is a complex concept, and its relationship to health has been widely debated. Across the European Union, there has been a move towards policies promoting social inclusion. Despite this, there has been a limited analysis of how the concept of social inclusion is operationalised in Irish policy. The aim of this research was to document and map the development of social inclusion policies in the Irish context. The objectives were to identify all the relevant stakeholders and policies and to describe the relevance of social inclusion policy in the domain of health.

Methods: We utilised a widely recognised policy analysis framework. We conducted a systematic search of relevant government policies, grey literature databases, statutory agencies and stakeholders in the Irish context since 2006. The researchers initially identified a total of 954 results.

Results: The relevant stakeholders discovered were the research community, service providers, civil society organisations, policy makers and government, philanthropists and socially excluded people. Most policy documents included refer to one of two national policies created to drive social inclusion activities. Social inclusion was being operationalised in the context of health, but the relationship between policymakers and those planning and providing services was unclear.

Conclusions: The concept of social inclusion was being operationalised in the Irish policy context. A multitude of stakeholders were involved, reflecting the wide reach of this concept in society. Social inclusion was a particularly important concept in the realm of health, and in the primary care domain in particular.

Keywords: Policymaking; Primary care; Social exclusion; Social inclusion; Stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;191:477-83 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Ageing. 2016 Oct 11;14(1):81-98 - PubMed
    1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 08;10:92 - PubMed
    1. Health Policy Plan. 1994 Dec;9(4):353-70 - PubMed
    1. Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Apr;6(2):205-17 - PubMed