Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;75(1):21-29.
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Trends in Kidney Function Outcomes Following RAAS Inhibition in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Affiliations

Trends in Kidney Function Outcomes Following RAAS Inhibition in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Wendy McCallum et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Rationale & objective: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are beneficial in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We sought to describe longitudinal trends in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in HFrEF and how ACE-inhibitor therapy influences these changes.

Study design: Post hoc analysis of trial data.

Settings & participants: Symptomatic (Treatment Trial, n=2,423) and asymptomatic (Prevention Trial, n=4,094) patients from the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD).

Exposure: Enalapril versus placebo.

Outcomes: Early and long-term eGFR slope (ie, within and after the first 6 weeks) and 4 kidney end points: (1) serum creatinine level increase by≥0.3mg/dL, (2)>30% eGFR decline, (3)>40% eGFR decline, and (4) incident eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2.

Analytical approach: Shared parameter models, multivariable Cox regression models.

Results: Baseline mean eGFR was lower in the Treatment Trial than in the Prevention Trial, 69.5±19.8 (SD) versus 76.2±18.6mL/min/1.73m2. Following randomization, an early eGFR decline occurred in the enalapril group; however, slopes during the median 3-year follow-up were not statistically different by randomization arm in either the Treatment Trial (-0.84 in enalapril vs-1.36mL/min/1.73m2 per year in placebo; P=0.08) or Prevention Trial (-1.27 in enalapril vs-1.36mL/min/1.73m2 per year in placebo; P=0.7). Random assignment to enalapril treatment increased the risk for all 4 outcomes in the Treatment Trial in the first 6-week period (HRs were 1.48 [95% CI, 1.10-1.99] for creatinine increase by≥0.3mg/dL; 1.38 [95% CI, 0.98-1.94] for eGFR decline> 30%; 2.60 [95% CI, 1.30-5.21] for eGFR decline> 40%; and 4.71 [95% CI, 1.78-12.50] for eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2), but after the first year was not significantly associated with increased risk. A similar albeit less pronounced pattern was observed in the Prevention Trial, with risks present only in the early period.

Limitations: Creatinine results were not blinded, making it possible that ACE-inhibitor/placebo dosing was influenced by creatinine level.

Conclusion: Kidney function decline is slow in HFrEF. Although random assignment to enalapril treatment results in a statistically increased risk for kidney surrogates, the risk is limited to the early phase and late eGFR slopes and risks are not different by randomly assigned group.

Keywords: ACE inhibitor; Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE); RAAS blockade; cardiorenal; chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4; eGFR slope; eGFR trajectory; enalapril; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); kidney disease progression; kidney function; renal end point; renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) over course of follow-up, stratified by trial and by randomization arm. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Slopes were not significantly different between the Treatment and Prevention Trials (p=0.5).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier plots of outcome-free survival, separated into the Treatment Trial and the Prevention Trial. Plots of incidence of creatinine increase by ≥0.3 mg/dl, decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by >30%, decline in eGFR by >40% and incident eGFR to <30 ml/min/1.73 m2. The number at risk can be found below each time separate plot.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). The New England journal of medicine. 1987;316(23):1429–35. Epub 1987/06/04. doi: 10.1056/nejm198706043162301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carson P, Tognoni G, Cohn JN. Effect of Valsartan on hospitalization: results from Val-HeFT. Journal of cardiac failure. 2003;9(3):164–71. Epub 2003/06/20. doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2003.22. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr., Drazner MH, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128(16):e240–327. Epub 2013/06/07. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holtkamp FA, de Zeeuw D, Thomas MC, Cooper ME, de Graeff PA, Hillege HJ, et al. An acute fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate during treatment with losartan predicts a slower decrease in long-term renal function. Kidney international. 2011;80(3):282–7. Epub 2011/04/01. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.79. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dries DL, Exner DV, Domanski MJ, Greenberg B, Stevenson LW. The prognostic implications of renal insufficiency in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2000;35(3):681–9. Epub 2000/03/15. - PubMed

Publication types