Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 2:10:55.
doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0363-4. eCollection 2019.

Potential relevance of pig gut content transplantation for production and research

Affiliations
Review

Potential relevance of pig gut content transplantation for production and research

Nuria Canibe et al. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. .

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly evident that the gastrointestinal microbiota has a significant impact on the overall health and production of the pig. This has led to intensified research on the composition of the gastrointestinal microbiota, factors affecting it, and the impact of the microbiota on health, growth performance, and more recently, behavior of the host. Swine production research has been heavily focused on assessing the effects of feed additives and dietary modifications to alter or take advantage of select characteristics of gastrointestinal microbes to improve health and feed conversion efficiency. Research on faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a possible tool to improve outcomes in pigs through manipulation of the gastrointestinal microbiome is very recent and limited data is available. Results on FMT in humans demonstrating the transfer of phenotypic traits from donors to recipients and the high efficacy of FMT to treat Clostridium difficile infections in humans, together with data from pigs relating GI-tract microbiota composition with growth performance has likely played an important role in the interest towards this strategy in pig production. However, several factors can influence the impact of FMT on the recipient, and these need to be identified and optimized before this tool can be applied to pig production. There are obvious inherent biosecurity and regulatory issues in this strategy, since the donor's microbiome can never be completely screened for all possible non-desirable microorganisms. However, considering the success observed in humans, it seems worth investigating this strategy for certain applications in pig production. Further, FMT research may lead to the identification of specific bacterial group(s) essential for a particular outcome, resulting in the development of banks of clones which can be used as targeted therapeutics, rather than the broader approach applied in FMT. This review examines the factors associated with the use of FMT, and its potential application to swine production, and includes research on using the pig as model for human medical purposes.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; Faecal-microbiota-transplantation; Feed conversion; Gastrointestinal tract; Health; Microbiota; Pig model; Pigs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Factors to be considered when performing faecal microbiota transplantation in pigs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anguita M, Canibe N, Perez JF, Jensen BB. Influence of the amount of dietary fiber on the available energy from hindgut fermentation in growing pigs: use of cannulated pigs and in vitro fermentation. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(10):2766–2778. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-212. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chowdhury SR, King DE, Willing BP, Band MR, Beever JE, Lane AB, et al. Transcriptome profiling of the small intestinal epithelium in germfree versus conventional piglets. BMC Genomics. 2007;8(1):215. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-215. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prakash S, Rodes L, Coussa-Charley M, Tomaro-Duchesneau C. Gut microbiota: next frontier in understanding human health and development of biotherapeutics. Biologics. 2011;5:71–86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parker A, Lawson MAE, Vaux L, Pin C. Host-microbe interaction in the gastrointestinal tract. Environ Microbiol. 2017;20(7):2337–2353. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13926. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luckey TD. Introduction to intestinal microecology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972;25(12):1292–1294. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1292. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources