Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 20:1:48.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0059-8. eCollection 2018.

Beyond "implementation": digital health innovation and service design

Affiliations
Review

Beyond "implementation": digital health innovation and service design

James Shaw et al. NPJ Digit Med. .

Abstract

Digital tools have shown great potential to enhance health services' capacity to achieve the goals of the triple aim (enhance patient experience, improve health outcomes, and control or reduce costs), but their actual impact remains variable. In this commentary, we suggest that shifting from a perspective focused on "implementing" new digital tools in health care settings toward one focused on "service design" will help teams execute more successful digital technology adoption projects. We present value proposition design (VPD) as a service design strategy requiring that stakeholders are brutally honest in determining the value of a new digital tool for their everyday work. Incorporating a perspective focused on how the value proposition of a technology is understood by each team member, and implications for their work routines, will help project teams to better understand how services can be reinvented during technology adoption initiatives. We present the simple heuristic [Tool+Team+Routine] as a reminder of the central considerations that make up a service design initiative, and present an illustrative case scenario of designing the use of a digital care coordination platform in an actual digital technology adoption project. We conclude by outlining two important challenges that need to be addressed to advance service design approaches to technology adoption in health care.

Keywords: Health services; Translational research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Team+Tool+Routine. When a technology (tool) includes a clearly stated, meaningful value proposition for all users who must interact with the technology or the information it generates, the team can use the technology to establish new routines involved in providing care, and ultimately a re-configured service

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kellermann AL, Jones SS. What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Aff. 2013;32:63–68. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0693. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Black AD, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff. 2011;30:464–471. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0178. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller FA, French M. Organizing the entrepreneurial hospital: hybridizing the logics of healthcare and innovation. Res. Policy. 2016;45:1534–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.009. - DOI
    1. Desveaux Laura, Shaw James, Wallace Ross, Bhattacharyya Onil, Bhatia R Sacha, Jamieson Trevor. Examining Tensions That Affect the Evaluation of Technology in Health Care: Considerations for System Decision Makers From the Perspective of Industry and Evaluators. JMIR Medical Informatics. 2017;5(4):e50. doi: 10.2196/medinform.8207. - DOI - PMC - PubMed