Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 24;4(2):179-187.
doi: 10.1080/20961790.2017.1349600. eCollection 2019.

Rapid and simple analysis of amphetamine-type illegal drugs using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence coupled with parallel factor analysis

Affiliations

Rapid and simple analysis of amphetamine-type illegal drugs using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence coupled with parallel factor analysis

Buyi Xu et al. Forensic Sci Res. .

Abstract

Nowadays, the abuse of illegal drugs has been an increasingly grim problem in the world. Excitation-emission matrix fluorescence combined with parallel factor analysis was used to make a quantitative analysis of the simulated amphetamine-type illegal drugs. Satisfactory results were achieved for simultaneous determination of methamphetamine (MAM) and 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in the presence of adulterants. The average recoveries were (99.8 ± 0.6)% and (101.6 ± 5.7)% for MAM and MDMA, respectively. Figures of merit including root-mean-square error of calibration and prediction, sensitivity and selectivity were investigated to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. The limits of detection were 0.054 and 0.002 1 μg/mL for MAM and MDMA, respectively.

Keywords: Forensic science; PARAFAC; excitation–emission matrix fluorescence; illegal drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The structures of methamphetamine (MAM), 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and their adulterants.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectrum of six ATS before (A1–F1) and after (A2–F2) handling the scattering signal. (A1, A2) MAM, (B1, B2) MDMA, (C1, C2) COC, (D1, D2) AM, (E1, E2) PSE and (F1, F2) CAF.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Loadings resolved from PARAFAC (solid line) and the actual spectra obtained from the individual compounds (dotted line). (A1–A4) excitation spectra and (B1–B4) emission spectra.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Emission spectra (A) and concentration loadings (B) of MAM in the presence of CAF.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Actual and resolved profiles by PARAFAC Model 5. (A) Excitation profiles, (B) emission profiles and (C) concentration scores.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Predicted concentrations decomposed by PARAFAC Model 5 and actual concentrations for MAM, MDMA and COC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kalasinsky KS, Hugel J, Kish SJ. Use of MDA (the “love drug”) and methamphetamine in Toronto by unsuspecting users of ecstasy (MDMA). J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:1106–1112. - PubMed
    1. Rezaee M, Mashayekhi HA, Garmaroudi SS. Simultaneous determination of amphetamine and related compounds in human urine using ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction and gas chromatography. Anal Methods. 2012;4:3212–3218.
    1. Nakamura S, Tomita M, Wada M, et al. . Quantification of MDMA and MDA in abusers' hair samples by semi-micro column HPLC with fluorescence detection. Biomed Chromatogr. 2006;20:622–627. - PubMed
    1. Wu TY, Fuh MR. Determination of amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in urine by online solid-phase extraction and ion-pairing liquid chromatography with detection by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2005;19:775–780. - PubMed
    1. Huang R, Su FH, Zheng H, et al. . Simultaneous determination of methamphetamine and ketamine in human hair using ultrasonication and LC-ESI-MS/MS method. Anal Methods. 2013;5:2007–2012.