Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Oct;147(1):102-107.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12922. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

A randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of preoperative rectal misoprostol for prevention of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss at elective cesarean delivery

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of preoperative rectal misoprostol for prevention of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss at elective cesarean delivery

Ahmed M Maged et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Oct.

Retraction in

  • Retraction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Dec;163(3):1059. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15205. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 37860890

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of preoperative rectal misoprostol for the prevention of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial of 200 full-term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. Computer-generated randomization allocated women to receive 400 μg rectal misoprostol at urinary catheter insertion plus 400 μg rectally after abdominal closure (preoperative group, n=100) or 800 μg of rectal misoprostol after abdominal closure (postoperative group, n=100). Primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss.

Results: Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the preoperative misoprostol group compared with the postoperative group (528.7 ± 114.8 mL vs 788.6 ± 165.8 mL; P<0.001). Blood loss during the first 24 hours after delivery was also lower in the preoperative group (199.3 ± 84.5 mL vs 302.9 ± 125.6 mL; P<0.001). Fewer women in the preoperative group needed additional uterotonics (7 vs 21; P<0.001). After delivery, the decrease in both hemoglobin and hematocrit levels was significantly less in the preoperative group (-6.8 vs -12.8% and -6.05 vs -17.8%, respectively; P<0.001).

Conclusion: Preoperative rectal administration of misoprostol significantly reduced intraoperative and postoperative blood loss during and after elective cesarean delivery. ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT03680339. Date of registration 9/2018.

Keywords: Egypt; Elective cesarean delivery; Intraoperative blood loss; Misoprostol; Postpartum hemorrhage; Randomized controlled trial; Rectal route.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Sweed MS, El-Saied MM, Abou-Gamrah AE, et al. Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol before cesarean section: Double-blind, three-arm, randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298:1115-1122.
    1. Hernández-Castro F, López-Serna N, Treviño-Salinas EM, Soria-López JA, Sordia-Hernández LH, Cárdenas-Estrada E. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of buccal misoprostol to reduce the need for additional uterotonic drugs during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;132:184-187.
    1. Maged AM, Helal OM, Elsherbini MM, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of preoperative tranexamic acid among women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131:265-268.
    1. Sharafi A, Ghasemi M. Comparison of rectal misoprostol's effect when used before and after a cesarean section on post-cesarean bleeding. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48:129-132.
    1. Gavilanes P, Morales MF, Velasco S, Teran E. Sublingual misoprostol is as effective as intravenous oxytocin to reduce intra-operative blood loss during cesarean delivery in women living at high altitude. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:559-561.

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources