Characterizing and Assessing the Impact of Surgery on Healthcare Spending Among Medicare Enrolled Preoperative Super-utilizers
- PMID: 31305286
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003426
Characterizing and Assessing the Impact of Surgery on Healthcare Spending Among Medicare Enrolled Preoperative Super-utilizers
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize preoperative super-utilizers and examine the effect of surgery on service utilization among patients undergoing major elective surgery.
Summary background data: Rising healthcare costs are becoming increasingly burdensome for Medicare. Super-utilizers have been increasingly identified and studied as this subset of patients consume a disproportionate amount of healthcare services compared with the majority of the population.
Methods: Patients aged 65 or older who underwent any of the following general elective surgeries: abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), colectomy, or hip replacement were identified using 100% Medicare Inpatient and Outpatient Standard Analytic Files (SAFs) from years 2012 to 2016. Medicare inpatient and outpatient expenditures the year before surgery, around the time of surgery, and the year after surgery were examined.
Results: Among 603,105 Medicare beneficiaries, 32,145 patients (5.3%) were categorized as super-utilizers. Compared with low-utilizers, super-utilizers were more likely to be male (low-utilizer vs super-utilizer: 47.9% vs 54.2%) and African American (4.0% vs 7.2%), whereas 58.8% (n = 208,080) of low-utilizers presented without any comorbidity [Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) = 0] and 49.8% (n = 16,007) of super-utilizers presented with a CCI score of ≥3. Total preoperative spending among super-utilizers was approximately $1.7 billion with a median of $3,159 [interquartile range (IQR): $554-$15,181] per beneficiary. Spending among super-utilizers accounted for 39.6% of total spending for all Medicare beneficiaries versus only 8.4% among low-utilizers. Although the median spending per Medicare beneficiary in the year after surgery was higher for super-utilizers compared with low-utilizers [$1,837 (IQR: $341-$11,390) vs $18,223 (IQR: $3,466-$43,356)], super-utilizers accounted for 13.5% of total postoperative spending. The reduction in adjusted average annual Medicare expenditure ranged from >$15,000 per year for patients undergoing CABG to approximately $30,000 per year for patients undergoing a hip replacement.
Conclusions: Although super-utilizers accounted for only 5.3% of patients, these patients accounted for 39.6% of total Medicare expenditures in the year before surgery. Among a subset of super-utilizers, surgical intervention was associated with a reduction in annual Medicare expenditure in the year after surgery.
Similar articles
-
Factors associated with switching between low and super utilization in the surgical population: A study in medicare expenditure.Am J Surg. 2020 Jan;219(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.042. Epub 2019 Aug 5. Am J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31405521
-
Novel Machine Learning Approach to Identify Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Super-Utilization of Medicare Expenditure Following Surgery.JAMA Surg. 2019 Nov 1;154(11):1014-1021. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2979. JAMA Surg. 2019. PMID: 31411664 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States.Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182402c17. Ann Surg. 2012. PMID: 22156928 Free PMC article.
-
How to Classify Super-Utilizers: A Methodological Review of Super-Utilizer Criteria Applied to the Utah Medicaid Population, 2016-2017.Popul Health Manag. 2020 Apr;23(2):165-173. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0076. Epub 2019 Aug 19. Popul Health Manag. 2020. PMID: 31424319 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to Decrease Use in Prehospital and Emergency Care Settings Among Super-Utilizers in the United States: A Systematic Review.Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Apr;77(2):99-111. doi: 10.1177/1077558719845722. Epub 2019 Apr 26. Med Care Res Rev. 2020. PMID: 31027455
Cited by
-
Hepatopancreatic Surgeons Versus Pancreatic Surgeons: Does Surgical Subspecialization Impact Patient Care and Outcomes?J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Apr;27(4):750-759. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05639-3. Epub 2023 Mar 1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 36857013
-
Association of Minority-Serving Hospital Status with Post-Discharge Care Utilization and Expenditures in Gastrointestinal Cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7217-7225. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14146-3. Epub 2023 Aug 21. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37605082
-
Change in healthcare utilisation after surgical treatment: observational study of routinely collected patient data from primary and secondary care.Br J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;129(6):889-897. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Oct 1. Br J Anaesth. 2022. PMID: 36192218 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Textbook Outcomes over Time: Are Optimal Outcomes Following Complex Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer Increasing?J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jan;26(1):50-59. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05129-4. Epub 2021 Sep 10. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022. PMID: 34506022
-
Comparing super-utilizers and lower-utilizers among commercial- and Medicare-insured adults with sickle cell disease.Blood Adv. 2024 Jan 9;8(1):224-233. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010813. Blood Adv. 2024. PMID: 37991988 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical