Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019;37(4):363-374.
doi: 10.3233/RNN-180894.

Effect of paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition in the quadriceps muscle group

Chandramouli Krishnan  1   2   3   4
Affiliations

Effect of paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition in the quadriceps muscle group

Chandramouli Krishnan. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019.

Abstract

Background: Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is commonly used to assess inhibition in the motor cortex and is known to be affected by the paired-pulse stimulus parameters (i.e., interstimulus interval [ISI], conditioning stimulus intensity [CSI] and test stimulus intensity [TSI]) used during testing. While the effects of stimulus parameters are well-studied in the upper-extremity, evidence in the lower-extremity is lacking.

Objective: To comprehensively examine the effects of alterations in paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of SICI in the quadriceps muscle group.

Methods: Seventeen adults (8 males, 9 females) volunteered to participate in this study. SICI was examined over a range of CSIs (70-90% active motor threshold [AMT]), TSIs (100-140% AMT), and ISIs (1.0-3.0 ms) using both EMG and torque responses elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Results: The results indicated that SICI at 1.0 ms ISI was best revealed with a CSI of 70% and TSI ≥110% AMT, whereas SICI at 2.5 ms ISI was best revealed with a CSI of 80-90% and a TSI of ≥130% AMT. Unlike upper-extremity muscles, evaluating SICI with a CSI of 70% AMT and an ISI of 1.0 ms produced the greatest inhibition for all TSIs. In general, inhibitory effects were contaminated by facilitatory effects when using a TSI of 100% AMT.

Conclusions: The amount of inhibition was dependent on the stimulation parameters used during testing. A CSI of 70% AMT, ISI of 1.0 ms, and TSI of ≥110% AMT appear to be optimal for measuring SICI in the quadriceps muscle; however, other parameters can be used if careful consideration is given to the described interaction between the parameters.

Keywords: Cortical excitability; bayesian; knee; paired-pulse stimulation; twitch; two phases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
A schematic of the (A) experimental set-up and (B) protocol.
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:
3D surface plots showing the relationship between interstimulus interval (ISI), test stimulus intensity (TSI), and short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) for the motor evoked quadriceps torque responses at various conditioning stimulus intensities (CSIs). Note the colors are only for illustration purposes.
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3:
3D surface plots showing the relationship between interstimulus interval (ISI), test stimulus intensity (TSI), and short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) for the EMG-based motor evoked potentials at various conditioning stimulus intensities (CSIs). Note the colors are only for illustration purposes.
Fig. 4:
Fig. 4:
Scatterplots demonstrating the relationship between short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) ratios obtained from motor evoked torque responses (MEP torque) and motor evoked potentials (MEP EMG) of vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), and quadriceps muscles (average of VM, RF, and VL).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Akima H, Saito A, Watanabe K & Kouzaki M (2012). Alternate muscle activity patterns among synergists of the quadriceps femoris including the vastus intermedius during low-level sustained contraction in men. Muscle and Nerve, 46(1), 86–95. - PubMed
    1. Bashir S, Vernet M, Najib U, Perez J, Alonso-Alonso M, Knobel M, Yoo WK, Edwards D & Pascual-Leone A (2016). Enhanced motor function and its neurophysiological correlates after navigated low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in stroke. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 34(4), 677–689. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bawa P & Murnaghan C (2009). Motor unit rotation in a variety of human muscles. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(4), 2265–2272. - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y & Hochberg Y (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
    1. Brownstein CG, Ansdell P, Skarabot J, Frazer A, Kidgell D, Howatson G, Goodall S & Thomas K (2018a). Motor cortical and corticospinal function differ during an isometric squat compared with isometric knee extension. Experimental Physiology. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources