Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 16;58(38):13318-13322.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201906381. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

Electrophotocatalysis with a Trisaminocyclopropenium Radical Dication

Affiliations

Electrophotocatalysis with a Trisaminocyclopropenium Radical Dication

He Huang et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Visible-light photocatalysis and electrocatalysis are two powerful strategies for the promotion of chemical reactions. Here, these two modalities are combined in an electrophotocatalytic oxidation platform. This chemistry employs a trisaminocyclopropenium (TAC) ion catalyst, which is electrochemically oxidized to form a cyclopropenium radical dication intermediate. The radical dication undergoes photoexcitation with visible light to produce an excited-state species with oxidizing power (3.33 V vs. SCE) sufficient to oxidize benzene and halogenated benzenes via single-electron transfer (SET), resulting in C-H/N-H coupling with azoles. A rationale for the strongly oxidizing behavior of the photoexcited species is provided, while the stability of the catalyst is rationalized by a particular conformation of the cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidine moieties.

Keywords: C−H functionalization; Electrophotocatalysis; oxidation; radical dication; trisaminocyclopropenium ion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Generic paradigms for (A) photocatalytic and (B) electrocatalytic oxidations. (C) Electrophotocatalytic oxidation with TAC ion 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Electrophotocatalytic C–H/N–H coupling of benzene and pyrazole 4. (B) 1H NMR spectra of (1) the reaction shown in Figure 2A; (2) the same conditions without catalyst 1 showing no reaction occurred; (3) the same reaction under direct electrolysis at 3.0 V; and (4) direct electrolysis of benzene at 3.0 V. (C) Visual comparison of attempted direct electrolysis and electrophotocatalytic reactions.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mechanistic rationale.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(A) Level inversion of a photoexcited TAC radical dication. (B) TD-DFT calculated orbitals of TAC radical dication 2. (C) X-ray structure of TAC radical dication 2. (D) Synthesis of TAC catalyst 1.

References

    1. Studer A, Curran DP, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 58–102; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 58–106. - PubMed
    1. Cho DW, Yoon UC, Mariano PS, Acc. Chem. Res 2011, 44, 204–215. - PubMed
    1. Shaw MH, Twilton J, MacMillan DWC, J. Org. Chem 2016, 81, 6898–6926. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schultz DM, Yoon TP Science 2014, 343, 1239176. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romero NA, Nicewicz DA, Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 10075–10166. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources