Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;82(3):622-627.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

Computer algorithms show potential for improving dermatologists' accuracy to diagnose cutaneous melanoma: Results of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2017

Collaborators, Affiliations

Computer algorithms show potential for improving dermatologists' accuracy to diagnose cutaneous melanoma: Results of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2017

Michael A Marchetti et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Computer vision has promise in image-based cutaneous melanoma diagnosis but clinical utility is uncertain.

Objective: To determine if computer algorithms from an international melanoma detection challenge can improve dermatologists' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used 150 dermoscopy images (50 melanomas, 50 nevi, 50 seborrheic keratoses) from the test dataset of a melanoma detection challenge, along with algorithm results from 23 teams. Eight dermatologists and 9 dermatology residents classified dermoscopic lesion images in an online reader study and provided their confidence level.

Results: The top-ranked computer algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, which was higher than that of the dermatologists (0.74) and residents (0.66) (P < .001 for all comparisons). At the dermatologists' overall sensitivity in classification of 76.0%, the algorithm had a superior specificity (85.0% vs. 72.6%, P = .001). Imputation of computer algorithm classifications into dermatologist evaluations with low confidence ratings (26.6% of evaluations) increased dermatologist sensitivity from 76.0% to 80.8% and specificity from 72.6% to 72.8%.

Limitations: Artificial study setting lacking the full spectrum of skin lesions as well as clinical metadata.

Conclusion: Accumulating evidence suggests that deep neural networks can classify skin images of melanoma and its benign mimickers with high accuracy and potentially improve human performance.

Keywords: International Skin Imaging Collaboration; International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; automated melanoma diagnosis; computer algorithm; computer vision; deep learning; dermatologist; machine learning; melanoma; reader study; skin cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Diagnostic accuracy of the top-ranked algorithm, dermatologists, and residents for melanoma on the 150-image dataset.
Receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrating sensitivity and specificity for melanoma of the top-ranked algorithm from the 2017 ISIC melanoma detection challenge (blue curve). Solid black box indicates the overall performance of 8 dermatologists (center “x”) along with 95% confidence band (rectangular bounding box). Dashed gray box indicates the overall performance of 9 residents (center “x”) along with 95% confidence intervals (rectangular bounding box).

References

    1. Marchetti MA, Codella NCF, Dusza SW, et al. Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(2):270–277.e271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Akay BN, et al. Expert-Level Diagnosis of Nonpigmented Skin Cancer by Combined Convolutional Neural Networks. JAMA Dermatol. 2018. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haenssle HA, Fink C, Schneiderbauer R, et al. Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1836–1842. - PubMed
    1. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542(7639):115–118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han SS, Kim MS, Lim W, Park GH, Park I, Chang SE. Classification of the Clinical Images for Benign and Malignant Cutaneous Tumors Using a Deep Learning Algorithm. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(7):1529–1538. - PubMed

MeSH terms