Computer algorithms show potential for improving dermatologists' accuracy to diagnose cutaneous melanoma: Results of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2017
- PMID: 31306724
- PMCID: PMC7006718
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.016
Computer algorithms show potential for improving dermatologists' accuracy to diagnose cutaneous melanoma: Results of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2017
Abstract
Background: Computer vision has promise in image-based cutaneous melanoma diagnosis but clinical utility is uncertain.
Objective: To determine if computer algorithms from an international melanoma detection challenge can improve dermatologists' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used 150 dermoscopy images (50 melanomas, 50 nevi, 50 seborrheic keratoses) from the test dataset of a melanoma detection challenge, along with algorithm results from 23 teams. Eight dermatologists and 9 dermatology residents classified dermoscopic lesion images in an online reader study and provided their confidence level.
Results: The top-ranked computer algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, which was higher than that of the dermatologists (0.74) and residents (0.66) (P < .001 for all comparisons). At the dermatologists' overall sensitivity in classification of 76.0%, the algorithm had a superior specificity (85.0% vs. 72.6%, P = .001). Imputation of computer algorithm classifications into dermatologist evaluations with low confidence ratings (26.6% of evaluations) increased dermatologist sensitivity from 76.0% to 80.8% and specificity from 72.6% to 72.8%.
Limitations: Artificial study setting lacking the full spectrum of skin lesions as well as clinical metadata.
Conclusion: Accumulating evidence suggests that deep neural networks can classify skin images of melanoma and its benign mimickers with high accuracy and potentially improve human performance.
Keywords: International Skin Imaging Collaboration; International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; automated melanoma diagnosis; computer algorithm; computer vision; deep learning; dermatologist; machine learning; melanoma; reader study; skin cancer.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

References
-
- Marchetti MA, Codella NCF, Dusza SW, et al. Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(2):270–277.e271. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Haenssle HA, Fink C, Schneiderbauer R, et al. Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1836–1842. - PubMed
-
- Han SS, Kim MS, Lim W, Park GH, Park I, Chang SE. Classification of the Clinical Images for Benign and Malignant Cutaneous Tumors Using a Deep Learning Algorithm. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(7):1529–1538. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical