Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):245.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2402-8.

Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study

Affiliations

Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study

Annalise Weckesser et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: In England, 27.8% of all pregnant women undergo caesarean sections (CS) to deliver their babies. Women undergoing CS are at risk of developing sepsis and post-natal infections, which not only contribute significantly to maternal mortality and morbidity, but also negatively impact upon post-natal recovery and wellbeing. This study explores patients' priorities in relation to CS recovery, focusing on their knowledge and experiences of infection prevention. The study formed part of the PREPS (Vaginal Preparation at caesarean section to Reduce Endometritis and Prevent Sepsis - a feasibility study of chlorhexidine) Trial; patients' views on the PREPS Trial were also sought.

Methods: Using qualitative methodology, two focus groups and six telephone interviews were carried out between September and October 2017 with a total of 21 women who had undergone a CS within the preceding six months. Focus groups and individual telephone interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim; a thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 11.

Results: Women's priorities around CS recovery centred on pain (or the lack thereof), mobility and the ability to resume everyday activities, including caregiving. Those undergoing a CS for the first time reported not feeling confident in their ability to identify signs of infection and sought visiting health professionals' expertise and reassurance. Women were unable to recall whether they had received information regarding infection prevention and felt that they had not received sufficient advice. Some reported receiving general information regarding CS recovery, which ranged in quality. Prevention of womb infection is a major goal of the PREPS trial, however, the majority of women were not aware that womb (as opposed to wound) infection was a post CS risk.

Conclusions: Women undergoing a CS want more information on what constitutes a 'normal' post-operative recovery and specifically would welcome written information and infection prevention advice. This should be a key element of improving post-CS maternal experiences and potentially reducing sepsis and infection rates. CS stigma negatively impacts women's recovery experiences and possibly information provision. The PREPS team incorporated findings regarding consent pathways for recruiting women into intrapartum research and developed two patient reported outcomes to collect in the main trial.

Trial registration: The PREPS trial has been registered with ISRCTN on the 10th July 2017 ( ISRCTN33435996 ).

Keywords: Caesarean section; Caesarean section recovery; Patient experience; Postnatal infection; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weiser Thomas G, Haynes Alex B, Molina George, Lipsitz Stuart R, Esquivel Micaela M, Uribe-Leitz Tarsicio, Fu Rui, Azad Tej, Chao Tiffany E, Berry William R, Gawande Atul A. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. The Lancet. 2015;385:S11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60806-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One [Internet] 2016;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NHS Digital. NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2016–17 [Internet]. 2017. p. 28. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB30137.
    1. Declercq E, Cunningham DK, Johnson C, Sakala C. Mothers’ reports of postpartum pain associated with vaginal and cesarean deliveries: results of a national survey. Birth. 2008;35(1):16–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00207.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawakita T, Landy HJ. Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery: epidemiology, prevention and treatment. Matern Heal Neonatol Perinatol [Internet] 2017;3(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0051-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed