Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study
- PMID: 31307417
- PMCID: PMC6631540
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2402-8
Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study
Abstract
Background: In England, 27.8% of all pregnant women undergo caesarean sections (CS) to deliver their babies. Women undergoing CS are at risk of developing sepsis and post-natal infections, which not only contribute significantly to maternal mortality and morbidity, but also negatively impact upon post-natal recovery and wellbeing. This study explores patients' priorities in relation to CS recovery, focusing on their knowledge and experiences of infection prevention. The study formed part of the PREPS (Vaginal Preparation at caesarean section to Reduce Endometritis and Prevent Sepsis - a feasibility study of chlorhexidine) Trial; patients' views on the PREPS Trial were also sought.
Methods: Using qualitative methodology, two focus groups and six telephone interviews were carried out between September and October 2017 with a total of 21 women who had undergone a CS within the preceding six months. Focus groups and individual telephone interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim; a thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 11.
Results: Women's priorities around CS recovery centred on pain (or the lack thereof), mobility and the ability to resume everyday activities, including caregiving. Those undergoing a CS for the first time reported not feeling confident in their ability to identify signs of infection and sought visiting health professionals' expertise and reassurance. Women were unable to recall whether they had received information regarding infection prevention and felt that they had not received sufficient advice. Some reported receiving general information regarding CS recovery, which ranged in quality. Prevention of womb infection is a major goal of the PREPS trial, however, the majority of women were not aware that womb (as opposed to wound) infection was a post CS risk.
Conclusions: Women undergoing a CS want more information on what constitutes a 'normal' post-operative recovery and specifically would welcome written information and infection prevention advice. This should be a key element of improving post-CS maternal experiences and potentially reducing sepsis and infection rates. CS stigma negatively impacts women's recovery experiences and possibly information provision. The PREPS team incorporated findings regarding consent pathways for recruiting women into intrapartum research and developed two patient reported outcomes to collect in the main trial.
Trial registration: The PREPS trial has been registered with ISRCTN on the 10th July 2017 ( ISRCTN33435996 ).
Keywords: Caesarean section; Caesarean section recovery; Patient experience; Postnatal infection; Qualitative research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine at cesarean section to reduce endometritis and prevent sepsis: A randomized pilot trial (PREPS).Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Feb;99(2):231-239. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13737. Epub 2019 Oct 8. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020. PMID: 31539171 Clinical Trial.
-
Women's experiences of intrapartum care and recovery in relation to planned caesarean sections: An interview study.Women Birth. 2021 May;34(3):e248-e254. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 Jun 2. Women Birth. 2021. PMID: 32507502
-
Chlorhexidine vaginal preparation versus standard treatment at caesarean section to reduce endometritis and prevent sepsis-a feasibility study protocol (the PREPS trial).Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jun 4;4:84. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0273-9. eCollection 2018. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018. PMID: 29881638 Free PMC article.
-
Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 22;10(10):CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6:CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub5. PMID: 30346040 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6(6):CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32580252 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Time-to-recovery after cesarean section delivery among women who gave birth through cesarean section at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, South Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;2(10):e0000696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000696. eCollection 2022. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36962571 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0517. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35226080 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Knowledge and Preference Towards Mode of Delivery among Pregnant Women in the United Arab Emirates: The Mutaba'ah Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 23;18(1):36. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010036. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33374611 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of adjunctive prophylactic macrolides used at the caesarean section on endometritis and surgical site wound infection: A meta-analysis.Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3307-3314. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14211. Epub 2023 May 9. Int Wound J. 2023. Retraction in: Int Wound J. 2025 Feb;22(2):e70221. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70221. PMID: 37161646 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Women's Experiences and Involvement in Decision-Making in Relation to Planned Cesarean Birth: An Interview Study.J Perinat Educ. 2021 Oct 1;30(4):213-222. doi: 10.1891/J-PE-D-20-00034. J Perinat Educ. 2021. PMID: 34908820 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weiser Thomas G, Haynes Alex B, Molina George, Lipsitz Stuart R, Esquivel Micaela M, Uribe-Leitz Tarsicio, Fu Rui, Azad Tej, Chao Tiffany E, Berry William R, Gawande Atul A. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. The Lancet. 2015;385:S11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60806-6. - DOI - PubMed
-
- NHS Digital. NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2016–17 [Internet]. 2017. p. 28. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB30137.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical